1. Home >
  2. Social Science >
  3. Economics >
  4. Resolved Question
Gigi Gigi
Member since:
September 25, 2008
Total points:
103 (Level 1)

Resolved Question

Show me another »

What Exactly Would Happen to U.S. Economy Without A Bailout?

I've heard all of the political rhetoric on both sides (repubs & dems), but I'd like to know the truth
  • 1 year ago
xaxorm by xaxorm
Member since:
August 18, 2008
Total points:
19602 (Level 6)

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Basically, If the banks go bust, then all the credit dries up, then nobody can borrow. Businesses will go bust left and right. That might happen anyway, but the bailout will probably alleviate it, maybe get us through the worst.
  • 1 year ago
67% 2 Votes
well put SpotsB4m...
the truth...you sure bout that..
its not the game of chess nor the pieces. but the players who push the pieces...
the fed reserv is not & never has been a part of the gov. whomever controls the currency makes the rules...privately owned and operated. the sheep need their shepard

Report Abuse

I agree wth SposB4m...the bailout is only a means to bankrupt the US Treasury. Once that happens, then there WILL be a depression that will make the Great Depression look like the recession of the late 80s. This will in turn cause a global Infamous Depression and anarchy, then history.

Report Abuse

Other Answers (1)

  • Spots^..^B4myeyes by Spots^.....
    Member since:
    August 03, 2007
    Total points:
    14210 (Level 6)
    We avoid another Great Depression.

    The president assures us that his administration "is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets." Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money creation spree were even mentioned?

    We are told that "low interest rates" led to excessive borrowing, but we are not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments – investments that do not make sense in light of current resource availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support, and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by the Fed.

    Not a word about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle. Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or "wildcat capitalism" (as if we actually have a pure free market!).

    Speaking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: "Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk."

    Doesn't that prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first place?

    It's the same destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression: prop up prices all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade. On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within less than a year.

    • 1 year ago
    33% 1 Vote

This question about "What Exactly Would H…" was originally asked in Yahoo! Answers United States

Answers International

Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Canada Answers content. Click here for the Full Disclaimer.

Help us improve Yahoo! Canada Answers. Tell us what you think.