No, I don't think so.
I've never had one. The first person accounts I've heard have all been really questionable stories from, ah, shall we say, individuals whose attachment is more firmamental than terrestrial.
If you look at the fantastic claims, you will find they always have very slim (anecdotal) evidence and explanation. It's always an individual or group with a self reinforcing rationale and no alternative explanation.
If you look at the debunking of the claims, it is just a matter of time before you will find very strong (empirical) evidence for alternative, simple explanations.
(And if you check out James Randi's challenge at
http://www.randi.org/joom/challenge-info… you will find that not one claimant has come even close to collecting the prize in 44 years - for very good reason. Check out Randi's very lucid explanation in his FAQ.)
For example, UFO sightings in the southwest have been shown to be due to atmospheric phenomena. Car lights from below the horizon are reflected off an inversion layer and to a distant observer they appear to be "groups of flying objects moving at hypersonic speed". What is more believable - aliens visiting us, taking hostages, 50 year government cover-ups - or a mirage?
When I was a child I was given paregoric (an opiate) for a stomach ache. That night I had dreams. Dreams that I was lying on a slab (conveniently, just like the one I saw in 2001 A Space Odyssey). The slab extended to the four corners of the universe. By lying on the slab and being in contact with it, I was in touch with everything, everywhere. I knew the ultimate truth of being. A feeling of overwhelming joy and contentment washed over me. When I awoke, the knowledge was gone.
Was I really there? Did I feel God? Nope, just a hallucination.
We can have visions from vivid dreams, from drugs, from psychosis, or just a simple physiological breakdown between the wakeful state and sleep (dreaming). Every one of these stories can be traced back to one thing - seeing something initially unexplainable and having a psychological need to explain it.
It's human nature. We always need to fill in the missing pieces to create a consistent narrative. We can't live with uncertainty so we will create any story, no matter how implausible, in order to bridge the gap. The nature of death is the ultimate unknown and so it is the source of an infinite variety of made up human stories.
Why is it that the further back in time you go, the more fantastic the stories become? You can never pin people down on these things. The more distant the claim the more difficult it is to show the veracity - to the point of being impossible - so the claims become more bold. The closer you get to the source the slipperier they get. As soon as you reach out to grab it - poof! - it evaporates; the claimant evades, the excuses and rationalizations multiply. How convenient.
When you combine compelling visions with a charismatic personality and group of impressionable followers you can wind up with anything from a group of gawkers looking at the Virgin Mary in a pile of chocolate to a worldwide movement of the duped. (See Joseph Smith and the Mormons, ad infinitum.)
There are an infinite number of irrational, invented narratives; but only one truth. We need to base our reality on the knowable, the empirical. As soon as we allow any one vision to be elevated to the status of doctrine (or dogma) we are guaranteeing our discourse will become a cacophony. Many may share a vision, but that is more likely just a function of our shared physiology and psychology.
The hard truth, the real truth is that there is no alternate reality. Maybe there are extra dimensions and other universes, but we will never access them. As Arthur Clarke explained, even in our real universe the distances are so vast and the stars so countless, we will never be able to visit even the tiniest fraction of it. Alternate planes of existence, hyper-speed travel, ESP and all the rest of it are figments of our imagination created in our own minds so that we may escape the brutal reality that there is no escape from this one.
I prefer agnosticism. We will never know; we can never know. The sooner we accept this the sooner we can cast off our irrational demons and evolve out of this pseudo-scientific, pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-spiritual prison of our own making. Rather than continuing to add layer upon layer of unnecessary confusion let us truly see the infinite beauty before us and accept it for what it is.
To do otherwise is to cast our fate to the wind.
This is more than an academic exercise. There are real problems that need to be solved now, before they become unsolvable. Let go of your fantasy world and start solving problems in the real world.
There's an old saying "Don't be so open minded that your brain falls out". Most stories are just that, stories. Some idiot wants to make a name for himself and goes out there preaching his Paranormal Experiences. Check www.snopes.com.
Report Abuse