1. Home >
  2. Health >
  3. Women's Health >
  4. Resolved Question
Emily L Emily L
Member since:
November 02, 2009
Total points:
102 (Level 1)

Resolved Question

Show me another »

Why do some women prefer circumcised men?

I was reading that some women don't have a preference whether their man's penis is circumcised or un uncircumcised but those who do prefer cut. Why is this? My fiance is uncut and as long as he keeps it clean is there really much of a difference besides the appearance?
  • 3 weeks ago
Jamie C by Jamie C
Member since:
April 26, 2008
Total points:
1568 (Level 3)

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

That's usually only in the US. Most men in the US are circumcised, so that's just what they're used to seeing. A lot of women there are also ignorant when it comes to penis. Not only have many women who judge guys based on this never even been with an uncircumcised guy before but most don't even know that the majority of men in the world (in almost every other country) are not circumcised. I American but I've lived in Europe for a few years now and my last two boyfriends were both uncircumcised. Having experienced both, I much prefer the natural way and can definitely see the advantages of a foreskin.

But a lot of girls from the US are also very superficial and hypocritical when it comes to physical appearance. They will accuse guys of being sexist pigs because of the way they judge a woman's body, but they will also be the first to say that uncircumcised penises (a natural part of every guy's body) is ugly or disgusting. I guess they don't spend much time looking at their own parts because vaginas aren't the prettiest things in the world. Besides when a penis is hard and the skin is back they all pretty much look the same anyway, so judging a guys penis based on looks is really stupid. Sex organs aren't meant to be aesthetic, they are meant to be functional. Any girl that would ask a guy to get circumcised due to her "preference" or any girl that says she wouldn't have sex with an uncircumcised guy is a huge hypocrite!
  • 3 weeks ago
Asker's Rating:
5 out of 5
Asker's Comment:
Thanks

There are currently no comments for this question.

Other Answers (9)

  • luv by luv
    Member since:
    September 25, 2009
    Total points:
    639 (Level 2)
    for me it's all about look. cant stand looking at uncut
    • 3 weeks ago
  • Caolan C by Caolan C
    Member since:
    October 26, 2009
    Total points:
    1745 (Level 3)
    Other then a much higher susceptancy to disease and the fact that it's unnatural, if you care, there is no difference for a woman. It's more about what the man wants.

    We're born with it for a reason.
    • 3 weeks ago
  • Natalie by Natalie
    Member since:
    August 12, 2009
    Total points:
    792 (Level 2)
    Idk y I like it I just do
    • 3 weeks ago
  • Emdee by Emdee
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Member since:
    September 14, 2009
    Total points:
    3928 (Level 4)
    Badge Image:
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Contributing In:
    Women's Health
    I prefer uncut. As long as it's kept clean, the problems with an uncut man are no different than the problems women face. Same rate of bladder infections and catching diseases.

    But the uncut men I've been with are all much more sensitive at the tip, and appreciated the attention paid there more. It's nicer to give a guy oral when he's clearly enjoying it so much.
    • 3 weeks ago
  • Beery by Beery
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Member since:
    February 26, 2008
    Total points:
    6425 (Level 5)
    Badge Image:
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Contributing In:
    Men's Health
    Only in the USA do women who express a preference usually prefer a mutilated penis. In the rest of the world women tend to prefer a natural healthy penis. The reason women in the US prefer a damaged penis is that it's what they're used to - they often don't know any better. Women in the rest of the world often know that a fully functional penis works better and keeps them healthier.

    There is a vast difference between a circumcised penis and a fully functional penis. The foreskin plays a role in protecting the vaginal wall, it keeps the vagina properly moist and natural penises don't require lubricant (as long as their owners know how to use them). A natural penis has more moving parts and moves more gently during sex.
    • 3 weeks ago
  • Connor by Connor
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Member since:
    November 17, 2008
    Total points:
    28149 (Level 7)
    Badge Image:
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Contributing In:
    Men's Health
    You know what I have found out?
    A vast majority of women who prefer circumcised haven't even been with an uncircumcised guy.

    How can you prefer snickers over milkyway if you haven't even has milkyway?

    -Connor
    • 3 weeks ago
  • SweetPea by SweetPea
    Member since:
    January 17, 2009
    Total points:
    452 (Level 2)
    I have never been with a man who was not circumcised, but I like the look of circumcised way more.
    Many of my girl friends have had uncircumcised and they didn't like it AT ALL compared to circumcised.
    It's all about personal preference, and how clean the guy is I guess.
    • 3 weeks ago
  • e w by e w
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Member since:
    May 22, 2008
    Total points:
    26395 (Level 7)
    Badge Image:
    A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
    Contributing In:
    Men's Health
    In the USA, there have been old wive's tales circulating for years about the non-existent benefits of male genital mutilation, called circumcision.

    There is also a lot of propaganda from the medical community, all of which has been disproven. They trot out a new disease every couple of years that circumcision is supposed to prevent, like STDs, penile cancer, and now HIV.

    People in Europe, Scandinavia, South America and most of Asia, where males are rarely circumcised, have a lower rate of these diseases, generally.

    STDs are slightly lower among non-circumcised males.

    And the appearance? In suburban America, where still the majority of males are circumcised, they're not used to seeing a whole penis, unmutilated and scarred.

    In the rest of the world, the appearance of the circumcised penis is seen as odd and unnatural---which is what it is.

    Most countries don't mutilate male infants. 80% of the males in the world are not circumcised; that's the normal and natural state of males.

    But some individuals have a problem grasping the concept that an undamaged penis feels and functions better than a damaged one.


    Circumcision is a fraud and a hoax.

    A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.

    ERIC
    • 3 weeks ago
  • john p by john p
    Member since:
    March 02, 2007
    Total points:
    1694 (Level 3)
    Many women prefer natural (intact). First, if it is the look, some say they like what they are more accustomed to. In the midwest most men are cut... in Europe almost all men are natural. The women in these places tend to answer based on the men. Many women say they don't like the looks of any penis. The real issue is the feel and the sex.

    As to look, a natural man can look cut, it can be pulled back even when flacid. The erect penis looks about the same cut or natural. This is one reason the ancient Greeks would not let cut men near the Olympics (it looked like they were aroused). Western civilization considered circucmicesed a mutilated penis and a harm to the natural form (which it is).

    With the internet, people are talking about this more and it is comming out that natural sex has aspects that are taken away by cut. Natural sex is better for both partners. The foreskin is not just skin and does not just protect the glans(head). Circumcision is now known to ablate the most sensitive parts of the male genitals. This surgery takes away the main male pleasure zones with about 20000 fine touch and stretch nerve endings amputated. The foreskin has several parts including the ridged band that is great for ones pleasure (that is why nutters like Kellogg wanted to chop em off, to curtail masturbation), Masturbation is imporantnt for mens physical and mental health. The ridged band directly contacts the vagina for very great pleasure all around. The dynamics of sex and the actual mechanism of the penis are drastically changed by circumcision. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the penis, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the penis and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated

    The only touch organ possessing as rich erogenous innervation as the foreskin is the clitoris. Circumcision deprives man of 2/3ds of the main erogenous zone constituted of the foreskin and the glans.

    Natural sex is better for feamle as to lubrication and comfort. There is also a dynamic interaction that is lost from cut.
    • 3 weeks ago

Answers International

Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Canada Answers content. Click here for the Full Disclaimer.

Help us improve Yahoo! Canada Answers. Tell us what you think.