Skip to search.
  1. Home >
  2. All Categories >
  3. Politics & Government >
  4. Politics >
  5. Resolved Question
Kevin Kevin
Member since:
March 12, 2012
Total points:
49 (Level 1)

Resolved Question

Show me another »

Universal Healthcare or Private Healthcare?

Pros or Cons

And what about a public-private mix? can that work?
The Patriot by The Patriot
A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
Member since:
April 10, 2007
Total points:
144,883 (Level 7)
Badge Image:
A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Universal healthcoverage.

Which is different from single payer healthcare. In many Western Democracies, universal health coverage is brought about through the use of private companies.

Why does no other developed nation have the old US model of healthcare? Because in the US model, before the reforms, insurance companies used death panels to deny care to those they were meant to cover. And then they raised costs [1]. Not only does the USA spend more on healthcare than any other nation [2], it finds itself bottom of the table when it comes to preventable deaths due to treatable conditions when it comes to developed nations [3]. The sad thing is that rather than focus on these things, the right spreads lies and half truths about the reforms and how healthcare works abroad [4]. Even sadder is the fact that the reforms are so simple [5]. But, if you think that my points are wrong, e-mail me with proof.

Source(s):

67% 2 Votes
  • 1 person rated this as good

There are currently no comments for this question.

This question about "Universal Healthcare…" was originally asked in Yahoo! Answers United States

Other Answers (3)

  • Terrel by Terrel
    Member since:
    November 29, 2009
    Total points:
    23,464 (Level 6)
    Private healthcare. The only kind of medical insurance that should be legal and available is catastrophic medical insurance that covers cancer, heart attacks and major surgeries. This would immediately lower health care costs because people would consume less of it. Now, everyone who has a policy runs to the doctor for every little thing. And doctors and hospitals and drug manufacturers and medical device makers charge big bucks simply because they see a bottomless well of money that's east to tap. Finally, a mix of public and private health care will simply degenerated into universal healthcare. Anything the government touches grows into a monstrosity and a failure.
    0% 0 Votes
  • Humans are Viruses by Humans are Viruses
    Member since:
    September 21, 2011
    Total points:
    7,577 (Level 5)
    A Mix is good. Well... Private healthcare is for profit so the more people they deny for procedures or healthcare the better. Government run healthcare is inefficient though.
    0% 0 Votes
  • Ron by Ron
    Member since:
    March 18, 2012
    Total points:
    69 (Level 1)
    I am game for public healthcare only if the people getting it pay for it
    33% 1 Vote

Answers International

Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Canada Answers content. Click here for the Full Disclaimer.

Help us improve Yahoo! Canada Answers. Tell us what you think.