Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
- 54Upvotes of all answers in this question
- 46Upvotes of all answers in this question
Have you noticed that the Climate Clown could never produce one shred of evidence to support his accusations?
His "proof" is usually to start a claim with "Obviously" or "Everyone knows that...", but when asked to produce actual evidence, he had nothing. On the other hand, people like David and I produced evidence and he ignored it or said it was faked.
You'll notice that my questions are open for EVERYONE to answer, while he blocks anyone that might refute him. That is another tip-off that he's lying.10 Answers8 hours ago
- 66Upvotes of all answers in this question
As I recall, this section was immediately filled with The Yahoo Joker, Hannah Texarkana, Army Guy Albany, Horse, Clown Crusher and dozens of others when he arrived. The wording on the answers would be identical from one to the other. Sometimes you could watch the names on the accounts change from one moment to the next. In a now deleted answer to his question, there was an answer that showed a screen shot with FIVE separate Clown Crusher accounts. The guy is a pathological liar.10 Answers8 hours ago
- 14Upvotes of all answers in this question8 Answers4 hours ago
- 120Upvotes of all answers in this question
The warming follows the logarithm of CO2 concentration, as expected, and the natural variability can be rejected as the cause of the warming at greater than a 99% level of significance.12 Answers2 days ago
- 26Upvotes of all answers in this question8 Answers22 hours ago
- 39Upvotes of all answers in this questionFavorite Answer:
That's their choice, Personally, I think of anthropogenic climate change as being a slow-burning emergency, but that doesn't mean I think we should drop the term "climate change."9 Answers1 day ago
- 40Upvotes of all answers in this question8 Answers23 hours ago
- 32Upvotes of all answers in this question
Which requires more knowledge of science, freely discussing science, or calling everyone that discusses it a sock puppet or a paid alarmist?
By "freely discussing science", that does not mean posting a bunch of papers where you misconstrue what they say and block everyone that would point that out.6 Answers6 hours ago
- 119Upvotes of all answers in this question
The undeniable fact is that “carbon dioxide” is NOT a “pollutant” but an absolutely vital trace gas in the Earth’s atmosphere, currently at around 0.004% of all its components. Nitrogen and Oxygen make up 99%, with the so-called greenhouse gases making up the remaining 1% of which CO2 is 0.04%.
Every climate model predictions have been WRONG. The alarmist climate science has not made it through the scientific method and is thus pseudoscience, backed by government consensus.
CO2 does not trap heat then recycle it to the surface, with repeated cycles called the “back radiation” loop, the key component of the anthropogenic global warming theory or as I call it hunch. This violates the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, the 1st law deals with the conservation of energy, with the back radiation loop being identified as a “perpetual motion engine” which violates this 1st law. The 2nd law deals with “heat only transfers from a warm object a cool object”. At the top of the atmosphere it is about -50 degrees C, with hardly any air pressure, there is no energy source to enable this rarified atmosphere to rotate down and reheat the surface of the Earth, this procedure violates both the 1st and 2nd law of T, plus a cool object cannot warm a warm object. Does an ice cube heat up your cup of coffee?23 Answers5 days ago
- 30Upvotes of all answers in this question15 Answers4 days ago
- 15Upvotes of all answers in this question
They have no idea what temperatures outside the US were in the year 1900. The global temperature record from NOAA/NASA/CRU/JMA is a complete fake, and the only reason that they come up with the same graph is because they are colluding to defraud the public. The only place which has good data back to 1900 is the US, and NOAA massively tampers with the US data to cool the past and create fake warming.5 Answers4 hours ago
- 14Upvotes of all answers in this question5 Answers4 hours ago
- 54Upvotes of all answers in this question
Doesn’t this real world observation totally dismantle the AGW hypothesis and put it into the hall of shame?
How can this be happening under the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis at this time of the year? Average world temperatures according to UAH is at -0.01 and even NASA has admitted that the Earth is headed towards cooling. The alarmist hockey stick graph temps have moved sideways for twenty years now.12 Answers4 days ago
- 69Upvotes of all answers in this question
Do you think what drove The Yahoo Joker/Clown Crusher the most crazy about me was that I played by the rules and he didn't?
He had dozens of accounts, I didn't. He blocked people from answering his questions, I never did. He hid his personal information, but I always shared mine. I gave science-based answers and he never did. I think it really drove him crazy that I didn't cheat the way he did.8 Answers2 days ago
- 17Upvotes of all answers in this question5 Answers16 hours ago
- 45Upvotes of all answers in this questionFavorite Answer:
I won't miss the pathological lies of Dirac and Georgie. Even now, Dirac is lying. But he got what he deserved and I loved seeing that.22 Answers7 days ago
- 26Upvotes of all answers in this question
Do some people think global warming is a hoax because they believe every word America's former president said is gospel truth?Favorite Answer:
No, I don't think they disbelieve AGW because of Trump, I think that is one of the reason they are Trump supporters.
Modern conservatism is delusional conservatism, because it is based on believing conspiracies and rejecting objective evidence. That made Trump the ideal candidate for the delusional conservatives--they reject global warming even though there is massive evidence the planet is warming, they believe in election fraud even though there is no evidence for it. They believe cutting taxes will increase revenue and balance the budget even though there is 50 years of evidence that shows the opposite is true.
I give Christian Sinner credit for finding a NASA link that at least casts a little doubt on the water vapor feedback, but I wonder how old that link is? There is increasing evidence that water vapor in the atmosphere is increasing with temperature, as the relative humidity stays approximately constant. Also, I question who ever wrote the original link, because the connection between temperature and water vapor content of the atmosphere is obvious to even casual observers. We all notice the atmosphere being dry during the winter and humid during the summer, so that's pretty strong evidence.
I don't give him credit for the cartoon he includes with his answer, which is insulting and obnoxious. I don't know what Christian Sinner does, but if he has such a low opinion of the ethics of scientists, then my guess is that he's not an ethical person himself.8 Answers3 days ago
- 3Upvotes of all answers in this question4 Answers4 hours ago
- 94Upvotes of all answers in this question
I think about it all the time. Global warming. Will we actually get it under control? Is it actually real? Will the world start dieing off someday in my life? What will happen when the earth heats up too much? We are gonna see problems like we never would have imagined. Billions of people will probably starve and people will be going crazy to survive. The ecosystem is already getting so messed up and you know I don't even have to go on about it23 Answers1 week ago