http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-... http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/cha... http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/cha... https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/jan/20/an-inconvenient-sequel-review-al-gore-climate-change-documentary http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/839284/Donald-trump-twitter-al-gore-movie-bbc-radio-4-today-inconvenient-truth-global-warming

Best answer: No. A great big one. Look at the charts for the last few million years and it is obvious.

Only by a few minutes but I wondered if it is part of Climate Change and if it will get worse.

http://notrickszone.com/2017/08/16/unant...

Best answer: They think 2016 is a hot year and its not over yet

Best answer: Eclipses have no influence on weather.

I say that the climate change theorists and the deniers BOTH don't know enough to back up their conclusions? That a HUGE complex system like a planetary environment isn't that easily reduced to formulas and definitive conclusions? And if I SUPPORT ecological measures because messing with the chemical balance and the heat balance of a system we don't understand and that _I_ rely on to keep me alive is a very very very bad idea? And, using expressions from a smaller scale, that we're burning a plastic fire on the living room rug with the windows closed, storing garbage in the bedroom, peeing in the well we drink out of, and running the heat and the air conditioner at the same time? Does my refusal to ritually bow before accepted conclusions about how the process of environmental degradation works, HAVE to mean I'm an anti-science dork who doesn't accept that degradation can happen?

Best answer: Because all the gov enemas are "adjusting the readings".

Hansen admitted on TV that Goddard had been "tweaking" satelite readings last 20 or so years. ("Tweaking" , his word).

https://www.heartland.org/publications-r...

** You can google or Bing .... "NASA NOAH Hadley...." and find the PDF of the study. released in June but liberal media .........Not a peep. Not surprising sence they already announced that no, alternative opinions (OR SCIENCE) was gonna be allowed on "their" airways.

They been using the "adjusted" readings to declare each year "the Warmest on Record". They just did it for 2016. The pressure for Global Warming policies is "heating up", obviously a lot more than the planet.

**Gore has another ridiculous "documentary" out ( with no documents whatsoever). It is more ridiculous than the other one.

Best answer: It takes a lot of specialized equipment and know how depending what you want your finished recycled product to be. Do a market analysis and do the math to figure out your return on investment

If we raise the price of gas, maybe to say $20 a gallon, people will drive less and/or switch to electric cars. If we raise the price of fish, people will eat less and their numbers will be allowed to recover. Raise the price on meat we would have less livestock and more of our farmland could be used to feed people instead of cows. Wouldn't it be a win for everyone if we just make things unaffordable?

We have these options - Stop Breeding - A Kull - A World War (Cough NK) - Keep Breeding Till we destroy this earth, - Wait for a disease to finally evolve to wipe us out - Leave Earth (Thanks Hawking for the obvious) (Also for that book The Shining) - Evolve - Start having only Siamese Children so 2 people can use up the same amount of space - Other options

Best answer: Design a boat with a conveyer designed to scoop up floating plastics and send it into the Great Pacific garbage patch- harvest it, bring it back, chip it and burn it in coal fired power stations as an added fuel.

Maybe not the best use of it - but the easiest, and will remove the problem in that area.
Clean burning coal power stations will be able to burn it with reduced emissions, and the heat produced is a valuable contribution rather than letting plastic float on the oceans for years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qT-rOXB...

Best answer: Climate change can happen naturally but the climate change that is happening right now is almost certainly significantly accelerated by human activity. There are a lot of people who like to deny that because it is so much easier to just say that it is untrue than to do anything about it.

P.S. - Anything can be pollution depending on its concentration and what effect it has on the ecosystem. It doesn't necessarily have to be immediately and highly toxic to humans.