How was our space born?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Jano
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    If by space you mean exactly the space of Physics, then it was born (as time was) along with the Universe. If by space you mean our Universe, the answer is that cosmologists, that are the astronomers interested in that topic, believe that our universe started from a extremely intense concentration of energy and matter that expanded since the very beginning to form starts, galaxies and all things that exists.

    They agree on that fact because from that hypothesis can be derived a lot of observable facts, such as the proportion of the existing elements, the structure of the deep universe, the cosmic radiation, and a very large number of astronomical features.

    You will ask now: How is it possible that such a huge amount of energy and matter sprout from nothing? Well, it seems that what we call vacuum is not actually nothing, but something plenty of potential energy, even if we cannot easily detect it. Cosmologist believe that our universe was born from a huge fluctuation of the quantum vacuum, something plausible according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

    It is an almost unbelievable idea, but scientist can obtain many answers from it that explain a lot of the physical features of our universe. Some of those conclusions have been possible thanks to simulations helped by supercomputers.

    I apologize for my poor English, but hope I made me understood.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    AN EASIEST WAY TO UNDERSTAND IS THAT:

    Scientists believed that billions of years ago, our space or rather the universe is created after the "BIG BANG".

    You can understand "The Big Bang" as an EXPLOSION of a PRIMEVAL ATOM.

    That also can explain "why is the universe is EXPANDING?"

    If you still don't know what "Big Bang" is, it is best that you go to these websites to find out more:

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    That long winded answer above is just a copy of the entire wikipedia web page on the subject! Just post the link as a source man!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Our first step in space was 1958 beta. Grape fruit size satellite.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    just as everyne else is born .... after the Big Bang.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    cleverdude did umean myspace?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    For other uses, see Big Bang (disambiguation).

    According to the Big Bang theory, the universe emerged from an extremely dense and hot state (singularity). Space itself has been expanding ever since, carrying galaxies with it.In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from a tremendously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The theory is based on the observations indicating the expansion of space in accord with the Robertson-Walker model of general relativity, as indicated by the Hubble redshift of distant galaxies taken together with the cosmological principle.

    Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity.

    The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (Hubble's law) began — calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago (± 2%) — and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory.[1]

    From this model, George Gamow was able to predict in 1948 the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB).[2] The CMB was discovered in 1964[3] and corroborated the Big Bang theory, giving it more credence over its chief rival, the steady state theory.[4]

    Physical Cosmology

    Physical Cosmology

    Universe · Big Bang

    Age of the universe

    Timeline of the Big Bang...

    Ultimate fate of the Universe

    Early universe

    Inflation · Nucleosynthesis

    Cosmic microwave background

    Expanding universe

    Redshift · Hubble's law

    Metric expansion of space

    Friedmann equations · FLRW metric

    Structure formation

    Shape of the universe

    Structure formation

    Galaxy formation

    Large-scale structure

    Components

    Lambda-CDM model

    Dark energy · Dark matter

    History

    Timeline of cosmology...

    Cosmology experiments

    Observational cosmology

    2dF · SDSS

    CoBE · BOOMERanG · WMAP

    Scientists

    Einstein · Lemaître · Friedman

    Hubble · Penzias · Wilson

    Gamow · Dicke · Zel'dovich

    Mather · Smoot · others

    This box: view • talk • edit

    Contents [hide]

    1 History

    2 Overview

    3 Theoretical underpinnings

    4 Observational evidence

    4.1 Hubble's law expansion

    4.2 Cosmic microwave background radiation

    4.3 Abundance of primordial elements

    4.4 Galactic evolution and distribution

    5 Features, issues and problems

    5.1 Horizon problem

    5.2 Flatness problem

    5.3 Magnetic monopoles

    5.4 Baryon asymmetry

    5.5 Globular cluster age

    5.6 Dark matter

    5.7 Dark energy

    6 The future according to the Big Bang theory

    7 Speculative physics beyond the Big Bang

    8 Philosophical and religious interpretations

    9 Notes

    10 External links and references

    10.1 Big Bang overviews

    10.2 Religion and philosophy

    10.3 Research articles

    [edit] History

    Main article: History of the Big Bang

    See also: Timeline of cosmology

    The Big Bang theory developed from observations of the structure of the universe and from theoretical considerations. Observers determined that most "spiral nebulae" were receding from Earth, but did not grasp the cosmological implications of this fact, or realize that the supposed nebulae were galaxies outside our Milky Way.[5] Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, independently derived the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker equations from Albert Einstein's equations of general relativity in 1927 and proposed, on the basis of the recession of spiral nebulae, that the universe began as a simple "primeval atom"—now known as the Big Bang.[6]

    Edwin Hubble provided an observational basis for Lemaître's theory two years later. He discovered that, seen from Earth, light from other galaxies is redshifted proportionally to their distance from Earth -- a fact now known as Hubble's law.[7][8] Given the cosmological principle whereby the universe, when viewed on sufficiently large distance scales, has no preferred directions or preferred places, Hubble's law implied that the universe was expanding, contradicting the infinite and unchanging static universe scenario developed by Einstein.[9]

    Artist's depiction of the WMAP satellite gathering data to help scientists understand the Big Bang.Two distinct possibilities emerged. One was Fred Hoyle's steady state model, whereby new matter would be created as the universe seemed to expand. In this model, the universe is roughly the same at any point in time.[10] The other was Lemaître's Big Bang theory, advocated and developed by George Gamow. Hoyle actually coined the name of Lemaître's theory, referring to it sarcastically as "this big bang idea" during a program broadcast on March 28, 1949, by the BBC Third Programme. Hoyle repeated the term in further broadcasts in early 1950, as part of a series of five lectures entitled The Nature of Things. The text of each lecture was published in The Listener a week after the broadcast, the first time that the term "big bang" appeared in print.[11] While Hoyle's "steady state" and Lemaître's "Big Bang" were the two most popular models used to explain Hubble's observations, other ideas were also proposed, including the Milne model,[12] Richard Tolman's oscillatory universe,[13] and Fritz Zwicky's tired light hypothesis.[14]

    For a while, support was split between the "steady state" and "Big Bang" theories. Eventually, the observational evidence began to favor the latter. The discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation in 1964 secured the Big Bang as the best theory of the origin and evolution of the cosmos. Much of the current work in cosmology includes understanding how galaxies form in the context of the Big Bang, understanding what happened at the Big Bang, and reconciling observations with the basic theory.

    Huge advances in Big Bang cosmology have been made since the late 1990s as a result of major advances in telescope technology as well as copious data from satellites such as COBE, the Hubble Space Telescope, and WMAP. Cosmologists can now calculate many of the parameters of the Big Bang to a new level of precision, leading to the unexpected discovery that the expansion of the universe appears to be accelerating (see dark energy).

    [edit] Overview

    See also: Timeline of the Big Bang

    A graphical timeline is available here:

    Graphical timeline of the Big BangBased on measurements of the expansion of the universe using Type Ia supernovae, measurements of temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background, and measurements of the correlation function of galaxies, the universe has a calculated age of 13.7 ± 0.2 billion years. The agreement of these three independent measurements strongly supports the so-called ΛCDM model that describes in detail the contents of the universe.

    The early universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly high energy density and concomitantly huge temperatures and pressures. Approximately 10−35 seconds after the Planck epoch a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, when the universe grew exponentially.

    After inflation stopped, the universe consisted of a quark-gluon plasma, perhaps experimentally produced recently as a quark-gluon liquid in which the constituent particles were all moving relativistically -- as well as all other elementary particles.[15] At some point a reaction (as yet unknown) which violated conservation of baryon number led to a very small excess of quarks and leptons over antiquarks and anti-leptons (of the order of 1 part in 1010) - this unknown process is called baryogenesis.

    As the universe continued growing in size, the temperature dropped. Symmetry breaking phase transitions put the forces of physics and elementary particles into their present form. Quarks and gluons combined into baryons such as protons and neutrons. The small excess of quarks over antiquarks led to a small excess of baryons over antibaryons. Below a certain temperature, new proton/antiproton pairs could no longer be created, and a mass annihilation between the remaining protons and antiprotons resulted in the complete disappearance of antiprotons and the almost complete disappearance of protons. A similar process happened for neutrons/antineutrons, and, at a lower temperature, for electrons/positrons.

    Later, some protons and neutrons combined to form the universe's deuterium and helium nuclei in a process called Big Bang nucleosynthesis. As the universe cooled, matter particles gradually slowed down from moving relativistically and its rest mass energy density came to gravitationally dominate that of radiation. After about 380,000 years the electrons and nuclei combined into atoms (mostly hydrogen); hence the radiation decoupled from matter and continued through space largely unimpeded. This relic radiation is the cosmic microwave background.

    Over time, the slightly denser regions of the nearly uniformly distributed matter gravitationally attracted nearby matter and thus grew even denser, forming gas clouds, stars, galaxies, and the other astronomical structures observable today. The details of this process depend on the amount and type of matter in the universe. The three possible types are known as cold dark matter, hot dark matter, and baryonic matter. The best measurements available (from WMAP) show that the dominant form of matter in the universe is cold dark matter. The other two types of matter make up less than 20% of the matter in the universe.

    The universe today appears to be dominated by a mysterious form of energy known as dark energy. Approximately 70% of the total energy density of today's universe is in this form. This dark energy causes the expansion of the universe to deviate from a linear velocity-distance relationship, observed as a faster than expected expansion at very large distances. Dark energy in its simplest formulation takes the form of a cosmological constant term in Einstein's field equations of general relativity, but its composition is unknown and, more generally, the details of its equation of state and relationship with the standard model of particle physics continue to be investigated both observationally and theoretically.

    All these observations are encapsulated in the ΛCDM model of cosmology, which is a mathematical model of the Big Bang with six free parameters. Mysteries appear as one looks closer to the beginning, when particle energies were higher than can yet be studied by experiment. There is no compelling physical model for the first 10−33 seconds of the universe, before the phase transition that grand unification theory predicts. At the "first instant", Einstein's theory of gravitation predicts a gravitational singularity where densities become infinite.[16] To resolve this paradox, a theory of quantum gravitation is needed. Understanding this period of the history of the universe is one of the greatest unsolved problems in physics.

    [edit] Theoretical underpinnings

    The Big Bang theory depends on three assumptions:

    The universality of physical laws

    The cosmological principle

    The Copernican principle

    These ideas were initially taken as postulates, but today there are efforts to test each of them. Tests of the universality of physical laws have found that the largest possible deviation of the fine structure constant over the age of the universe is of order 10-5.[17] The isotropy of the universe that defines the Cosmological Principle has been tested to a level of 10-5 and the universe has been measured to be homogeneous on the largest scales to the 10% level.[18] There are efforts to test the Copernican Principle by looking at the interaction of galaxy groups and clusters with the CMB through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect to a level of 1% accuracy.[19]

    These assumptions, combined with Einstein's theory of general relativity, imply that spacetime should be described by a homogeneous and isotropic metric, which must therefore be a FRW metric. These metrics rely on a coordinate chart or grid being laid down over all spacetime, with which we can specify the location of points (e.g., galaxies, stars...) in the universe. The specific chart used is called a comoving coordinate system, since the grid is designed to expand along with the universe, and so objects that are carried along by the expansion of the universe remain at fixed points on the grid. While their coordinate distance (comoving distance) remains constant, the physical distance between two such comoving points expands proportionally with the scale factor of the universe. See also metric expansion of space.

    As the universe can be described by such coordinates, the Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe; space itself expanded and caused the physical distance between two comoving points to increase. Objects that are bound together (such as atoms, people, stars, the solar system, and galaxies) do not expand with spacetime's expansion because the forces that bind them together are strong compared with the Hubble expansion that is pulling them apart.

    One can also define a conformal time η, in which case the full spacetime metric takes the form of a static metric multiplied by an overall scale factor. The conformal time coordinate is quite useful since the comoving distance traveled by a light ray is equal to the conformal time interval of the trip. This enables understanding of the causal structure of spacetime. For example, the Big Bang occurred at a finite interval of conformal time η0 to the past. Objects whose comoving distance is greater than cη0 are too far away for light to have had time to travel to us since the Big Bang: therefore we cannot see all of the past universe and there is a past horizon. If the universe is accelerating, then there is only a finite amount of conformal time ηF to the future (though this finite amount of conformal time corresponds to an infinite amount of clock or proper time). Objects located at comoving distances further than cηF can never be reached by a light ray emitted by us today, therefore we cannot influence all of the future universe and there is a future horizon. See also cosmological horizon.

    [edit] Observational evidence

    It is generally stated that there are three observational pillars that support the Big Bang theory of cosmology. These are the Hubble-type expansion seen in the redshifts of galaxies, the detailed measurements of the cosmic microwave background, and the abundance of light elements (see Big Bang nucleosynthesis). Additionally, the observed correlation function of large-scale structure of the cosmos fits well with standard Big Bang theory.

    [edit] Hubble's law expansion

    Main article: Hubble's law

    Hubble's original data from his 1929 paper.[20]Observations of distant galaxies and quasars show that these objects are redshifted -- the light emitted from them has been shifted to longer wavelengths. This is seen by taking a frequency spectrum of the objects and then matching the spectroscopic pattern of emission lines or absorption lines corresponding to atoms of the chemical elements interacting with the light. From this analysis, a redshift corresponding to a Doppler shift for the radiation can be measured which is explained by a recessional velocity. When the recessional velocities are plotted against the distances to the objects, a linear relationship, known as Hubble's law, is observed:

    where

    v is the recessional velocity of the galaxy or other distant object

    D is the distance to the object and

    H0 is Hubble's constant, measured to be (70 +2.4/-3.2) km/s/Mpc by the WMAP probe.[21]

    The Hubble's law observation has two possible explanations, one of which -- that we are at the center of an explosion of galaxies -- is untenable given the Copernican principle. The other explanation is that the universe is uniformly expanding everywhere as a unique property of spacetime. This universal expansion was developed mathematically in the context of general relativity well before Hubble made his analysis and observations, and it remains the cornerstone of the Big Bang theory as developed by Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker.

    [edit] Cosmic microwave background radiation

    Main article: Cosmic microwave background radiation

    WMAP image of the cosmic microwave background radiationThe Big Bang theory predicted the existence of the cosmic microwave background radiation, or CMB, which is composed of photons first emitted during baryogenesis. Because the early universe was in thermal equilibrium, the temperature of the radiation and the plasma were equal until the plasma recombined. Before atoms formed, radiation was constantly absorbed and re-emitted in a process called Compton scattering: the early universe was opaque to light. However, cooling due to the expansion of the universe allowed the temperature to eventually fall below 3,000 K, at which point electrons and nuclei combined to form atoms and the primordial plasma turned into a neutral gas in a process called photon decoupling. A universe with only neutral atoms allows radiation to travel largely unimpeded.

    Because the early universe was in thermal equilibrium, the radiation from this time had a blackbody spectrum and freely streamed through space until today, becoming redshifted because of the Hubble expansion, reducing the high temperature of the blackbody spectrum. The radiation is thought to be observable at every point in the universe as coming from all directions.

    In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally discovered the cosmic background radiation while conducting diagnostic observations using a new microwave receiver owned by Bell Laboratories.[3] Their discovery provided substantial confirmation of the general CMB predictions—the radiation was found to be isotropic and consistent with a blackbody spectrum of about 3 K—and it pitched the balance of opinion in favor of the Big Bang hypothesis. Penzias and Wilson were awarded the Nobel Prize for their discovery.

    In 1989, NASA launched the Cosmic Background Explorer satellite (COBE), and the initial findings, released in 1990, were consistent with the Big Bang's predictions regarding the CMB. COBE found a residual temperature of 2.726 K and determined that the CMB was isotropic to about one part in 105.[22] During the 1990s, CMB anisotropies were further investigated by a large number of ground-based experiments and the universe was shown to be almost geometrically flat by measuring the typical angular size (the size on the sky) of the anisotropies. (See shape of the universe.)

    In early 2003, the results of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy satellite (WMAP) were released, yielding what were at the time the most accurate values for some of the cosmological parameters. (See cosmic microwave background radiation experiments.) This satellite also disproved several specific cosmic inflation models, but the results were consistent with the inflation theory in general.[23]

    [edit] Abundance of primordial elements

    Main article: Big Bang nucleosynthesis

    Using the Big Bang model it is possible to calculate the concentration of helium-4, helium-3, deuterium and lithium-7 in the universe as ratios to the amount of ordinary hydrogen, H.[24] All the abundances depend on a single parameter, the ratio of photons to baryons. The ratios predicted (by mass, not by number) are about 0.25 for 4He/H, about 10-3 for 2H/H, about 10-4 for 3He/H and about 10-9 for 7Li/H.

    The measured abundances all agree with those predicted from a single value of the baryon-to-photon ratio. The agreement is relatively poor for 7Li and 4He, the two elements for which the systematic uncertainties are least understood. This is considered strong evidence for the Big Bang, as the theory is the only known explanation for the relative abundances of light elements.[25] Indeed there is no obvious reason outside of the Big Bang that, for example, the young universe (i.e., before star formation, as determined by studying matter essentially free of stellar nucleosynthesis products) should have more helium than deuterium or more deuterium than 3He, and in constant ratios, too.

    [edit] Galactic evolution and distribution

    Main articles: Large-scale structure of the cosmos, Structure formation, and Galaxy formation and evolution

    Detailed observations of the morphology and distribution of galaxies and quasars provide strong evidence for the Big Bang. A combination of observations and theory suggest that the first quasars and galaxies formed about a billion years after the Big Bang, and since then larger structures have been forming, such as galaxy clusters and superclusters. Populations of stars have been aging and evolving, so that distant galaxies (which are observed as they were in the early universe) appear very different from nearby galaxies (observed in a more recent state). Moreover, galaxies that formed relatively recently appear markedly different from galaxies formed at similar distances but shortly after the Big Bang. These observations are strong arguments against the steady-state model. Observations of star formation, galaxy and quasar distributions, and larger structures agree well with Big Bang simulations of the formation of structure in the universe and are helping to complete details of the theory.[26]

    [edit] Features, issues and problems

    While very few researchers now doubt the Big Bang occurred, the scientific community was once divided between supporters of the Big Bang and those of alternative cosmological models. Throughout the historical development of the subject, problems with the Big Bang theory were posed in the context of a scientific controversy regarding which model could best describe the cosmological observations (see history section above). With the overwhelming consensus in the community today supporting the Big Bang model, many of these problems are remembered as being mainly of historical interest; the solutions to them have been obtained either through modifications to the theory or as the result of better observations. Other issues, such as the cuspy halo problem and the dwarf galaxy problem of cold dark matter, are not considered to be fatal as they can be addressed through further refinements of the theory.

    The Big Bang model admits very exotic physical phenomena that include dark matter, dark energy, and cosmic inflation which rely on conditions and physics that have not yet been observed in terrestrial laboratory experiments. While explanations for such phenomena remain at the frontiers of inquiry in physics, independent observations of Big Bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, large scale structure and Type Ia supernovae strongly suggest the phenomena are important and real cosmological features of our universe. The gravitational effects of these features are understood observationally and theoretically but they have not yet been successfully incorporated into the Standard Model of particle physics. Though some aspects of the theory remain inadequately explained by fundamental physics, almost all cosmologists accept that the close agreement between Big Bang theory and observation have firmly established all the basic parts of the theory.

    The following is a short list of Big Bang "problems" and puzzles:

    [edit] Horizon problem

    Main article: Horizon problem

    The horizon problem results from the premise that information cannot travel faster than light, and hence two regions of space which are separated by a greater distance than the speed of light multiplied by the age of the universe cannot be in causal contact.[24] The observed isotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is problematic in this regard, because the horizon size at that time corresponds to a size that is about 2 degrees on the sky. If the universe has had the same expansion history since the Planck epoch, there is no mechanism to cause these regions to have the same temperature.

    A resolution to this apparent inconsistency is offered by inflationary theory in which a homogeneous and isotropic scalar energy field dominates the universe at a time 10-35 seconds after the Planck epoch. During inflation, the universe undergoes exponential expansion, and regions in causal contact expand so as to be beyond each other's horizons. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle predicts that during the inflationary phase there would be quantum thermal fluctuations, which would be magnified to cosmic scale. These fluctuations serve as the seeds of all current structure in the universe. After inflation, the universe expands according to Hubble's law, and regions that were out of causal contact come back into the horizon. This explains the observed isotropy of the CMB. Inflation predicts that the primordial fluctuations are nearly scale invariant and Gaussian which has been accurately confirmed by measurements of the CMB.

    [edit] Flatness problem

    Main article: Flatness problem

    The overall geometry of the universe is determined by whether the Omega cosmological parameter is less than, equal to or greater than 1. From top to bottom: geometry in a closed universe, an open universe and a flat universeThe flatness problem is an observational problem associated with a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric.[24] In general, the universe can have three kinds of geometries - hyperbolic geometry, Euclidean geometry, or elliptic geometry - depending on the total energy density of the universe as measured by means of the stress-energy tensor. It is hyperbolic if its density is less than the critical density, elliptic if greater, and Euclidean at the critical density. The universe must have been within one part in 1015 of the critical density in its earliest stages, or it would have caused either a Heat Death or a Big Crunch, and the universe would not exist as it does today.

    A possible resolution to this problem is again offered by inflationary theory. During the inflationary period, spacetime expanded to such an extent that any residual curvature associated with it would have been smoothed out to a high degree of precision. Thus, it is believed that inflation drove the universe to be very nearly spatially flat.

    [edit] Magnetic monopoles

    The magnetic monopole objection was raised in the late 1970s. Grand unification theories predicted point defects in space that would manifest as magnetic monopoles with a density much higher than was consistent with observations, given that searches have never found any monopoles. This problem is also resolvable by cosmic inflation, which removes all point defects from the observable universe in the same way that it drives the geometry to flatness.[24]

    [edit] Baryon asymmetry

    It is not yet understood why the universe has more matter than antimatter.[24] It is generally assumed that when the universe was young and very hot, it was in statistical equilibrium and contained equal numbers of baryons and anti-baryons. However, observations suggest that the universe, including its most distant parts, is made almost entirely of matter. An unknown process called baryogenesis created the asymmetry. For baryogenesis to occur, the Sakharov conditions, which were laid out by Andrei Sakharov, must be satisfied. They require that baryon number be not conserved, that C-symmetry and CP-symmetry be violated, and that the universe depart from thermodynamic equilibrium.[27] All these conditions occur in the Standard Model, but the effect is not strong enough to explain the present baryon asymmetry.[28] Experiments taking place at CERN near Geneva seek to trap enough anti-hydrogen to compare its spectrum with hydrogen. Any difference would be evidence of a CPT symmetry violation and therefore a Lorentz violation.

    [edit] Globular cluster age

    In the mid-1990s, observations of globular clusters appeared to be inconsistent with the Big Bang. Computer simulations that matched the observations of the stellar populations of globular clusters suggested that they were about 15 billion years old, which conflicted with the 13.7-billion-year age of the universe. This issue was generally resolved in the late 1990s when new computer simulations, which included the effects of mass loss due to stellar winds, indicated a much younger age for globular clusters.[29] There still remain some questions as to how accurately the ages of the clusters are measured, but it is clear that these objects are some of the oldest in the universe.

    [edit] Dark matter

    Main article: Dark matter

    A pie chart indicating the proportional composition of different energy-density components of the universe, according to the best ΛCDM model fits. Roughly ninety-five percent is in the exotic forms of dark matter and dark energyDuring the 1970s and 1980s, various observations (notably of galactic rotation curves) showed that there is not sufficient visible matter in the universe to account for the apparent strength of gravitational forces within and between galaxies. This led to the idea that up to 90% of the matter in the universe is not normal or baryonic matter but rather dark matter. In addition, the assumption that the universe is mostly normal matter led to predictions that were strongly inconsistent with observations. In particular, the universe is far less lumpy and contains far less deuterium than can be accounted for without dark matter. While dark matter was initially controversial, it is now widely accepted in standard cosmology due to observations of the anisotropies in the CMB, galaxy cluster velocity dispersions, large-scale structure distributions, gravitational lensing studies, and x-ray measurements from galaxy clusters. In August 2006, dark matter was definitively observed through measurements of colliding galaxies in the Bullet Cluster.[30][31]

    The detection of dark matter is sensitive only to its gravitational signature, and no dark matter particles have been observed in laboratories. Many particle physics candidates for dark matter have been proposed, however, and several projects to detect them directly are underway.

    [edit] Dark energy

    Main article: Dark energy

    In the 1990s, detailed measurements of the mass density of the universe revealed a value that was 30% that of the critical density.[9] Since the universe is very nearly spatially flat, as is indicated by measurements of the cosmic microwave background, about 70% of the energy density of the universe was left unaccounted for. This mystery now appears to be connected to another one: Independent measurements of Type Ia supernovae have revealed that the expansion of the universe is undergoing a non-linear acceleration. To explain this acceleration, general relativity requires that much of the universe consist of an energy component with large negative pressure. This dark energy is now thought to make up the missing 70%. Its nature remains one of the great mysteries of the Big Bang. Possible candidates include a scalar cosmological constant and quintessence making up physical vacuum. Observations to help understand this are ongoing. Results from WMAP in 2006 indicate that the universe is 74% dark energy, 22% dark matter, and 4% regular matter.

    [edit] The future according to the Big Bang theory

    Main article: Ultimate fate of the universe

    Before observations of dark energy, cosmologists considered two scenarios for the future of the universe. If the mass density of the universe is above the critical density, then the universe would reach a maximum size and then begin to collapse. It would become denser and hotter again, ending with a state that was similar to that in which it started—a Big Crunch. Alternatively, if the density in the universe is equal to or below the critical density, the expansion would slow down, but never stop. Star formation would cease as the universe grows less dense. The average temperature of the universe would asymptotically approach absolute zero—a Big Freeze. Black holes would evaporate. The entropy of the universe would increase to the point where no organized form of energy could be extracted from it, a scenario known as heat death. Moreover, if the proton was unstable, then hydrogen, the predominant form of baryonic matter in the universe today, would disappear, leaving only radiation.

    Modern observations of accelerated expansion imply that more and more of the currently visible universe will pass beyond our event horizon and out of contact with us. The eventual result is not known. The ΛCDM model of the universe contains dark energy in the form of a cosmological constant. This theory suggests that only gravitationally bound systems, such as galaxies, would remain together, and they too would be subject to heat death, as the universe cools and expands. Other explanations of dark energy — so-called phantom energy theories — suggest that ultimately galaxy clusters, stars, planets, atoms, nuclei and matter itself will be torn apart by the ever-increasing expansion in a so-called Big Rip.

    [edit] Speculative physics beyond the Big Bang

    A graphical representation of the expansion of the universe with the inflationary epoch represented as the dramatic expansion of the metric seen on the left. Image from WMAP press release, 2006. (Detail)While the Big Bang model is well established in cosmology, it is likely to be refined in the future. Little is known about the earliest universe, when inflation is hypothesized to have occurred. There may also be parts of the universe well beyond what can be observed in principle. In the case of inflation this is required: exponential expansion has pushed large regions of space beyond our observable horizon. It may be possible to deduce what happened when physics at very high energy scales is better understood. Speculations about this often involve theories of quantum gravitation.

    Some proposals are:

    models including the Hartle-Hawking boundary condition in which the whole of space-time is finite;

    brane cosmology models, including brane inflation, in which inflation is due to the movement of branes in string theory; the pre-big bang model; the ekpyrotic model, in which the Big Bang is the result of a collision between branes; and the cyclic model, a variant of the ekpyrotic model in which collisions occur periodically.

    chaotic inflation, in which inflation starts from random initial conditions for the universe.

    Some of these scenarios are qualitatively compatible with one another. Each entails untested hypotheses.

    [edit] Philosophical and religious interpretations

    The Big Bang, a scientific theory, is not based on any religion. Some people have found similarities, however, that they believe have both theological and philosophical implications, since some religious interpretations and world views conflict with the Big Bang origin of the universe.

    Some interpretations of the Big Bang theory go beyond science, and some purport to explain the cause of the Big Bang itself (first cause). These views have been criticized by some naturalist philosophers as being modern creation myths. Some people believe that the Big Bang theory is inconsistent with traditional views of creation such as that in Genesis, for example, while others, like astronomer Hugh Ross, believe that the Big Bang theory lends support to the idea of creation ex nihilo.[32]

    The following is a list of various religious interpretations of the Big Bang theory:

    A number of Christian and traditional Jewish sources have accepted the Big Bang as a possible description of the origin of the universe, interpreting it to allow for a philosophical first cause. Pope Pius XII was an enthusiastic proponent of the Big Bang even before the theory was scientifically well-established and consequently the Roman Catholic Church has been a prominent advocate for the idea that creation ex nihilo can be interpreted as consistent with the Big Bang. This view is shared by many religious Jews in all branches of rabbinic Judaism. Some groups contend the Big Bang is also consistent with the teaching of creation according to Kabbalah. [33]

    Some modern Islamic scholars believe that the Qur'an parallels the Big Bang in its account of creation, described as follows: "Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one unit of creation, before We clove them asunder?" (Ch:21,Ver:30). The claim has also been made that the Qur'an describes an expanding universe: "The heaven, We have built it with power. And verily, We are expanding it." (Ch:51,Ver:47).[34] Parallels with the Big Crunch and an oscillating universe have also been suggested: "On the day when We will roll up the heavens like the rolling up of the scroll for writings, as We originated the first creation, (so) We shall reproduce it; a promise (binding on Us); surely We will bring it about." (Ch:21,Ver:104).

    Certain theistic branches of Hinduism, such as in Vaishnavism, conceive of a creation event with similarities to the Big Bang. For example in the third book of the Bhagavata Purana (primarily, chapters 10 and 26), describes a primordial state which bursts forth as the Great Vishnu glances over it, transforming into the active state of the sum-total of matter ("prakriti"). Other forms of Hinduism assert a universe without beginning or end.

    Buddhism has a concept of universes that have no initial creation event, but instead go through infinitely repeated cycles of expansion, stability, destruction, and quiescence. The Big Bang may be reconciled with this view, since there are ways to conceive an eternal creation and destruction of universes within the paradigm. A number of popular Zen philosophers were intrigued, in particular, by the concept of the oscillatory universe.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.