Positivism, Logical Positivism and Empiricism. What is the difference?
I have come to understand that there is a difference in the time that these were thought up, but what is the difference in their meaning?
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
"Empiricism: (1) A proposition about the sources of knowledge: that the sole source of knowledge is experience, or that either no knowledge at all or no knowledge with existential reference is possible independently of experience."
"Logical Positivists [assure us] that such concepts as metaphysics or existence or reality or thing or matter or mind are meaningless—let the mystics care whether they exist or not, a scientist does not have to know it; [ ] Knowledge, they said, consists, not of facts, but of words, words unrelated to objects, words of an arbitrary social convention, as an irreducible primary; thus knowledge is merely a matter of manipulating language. "
"Positivism is a system of philosophical and religious doctrines elaborated by Auguste Comte. As a philosophical system or method, Positivism denies the validity of metaphysical speculations, and maintains that the data of sense experience are the only object and the supreme criterion of human knowledge; as a religious system, it denies the existence of a personal God and takes humanity, "the great being", as the object of its veneration and cult. We shall give a brief historical sketch of Positivism, an exposition of its fundamental principles, and a criticism of them."Source(s): My site: Thank you very much for looking at it. http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/
- 6 years ago
Positivism deals with facts, Facts and more facts and generalize from those facts = Induction.
Where as Logical Positivism goes through Theory- Verifiability-tests- Generalize = Deduction