How did the assassination of Franz Ferdinand II began WWI?

someone help me out on this please

2 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    A Serbian terrorist group, the Black Hand, resolved to assassinate Franz Ferdinand during his visit to Sarajevo on 28 June 1914, thereby stalling his proposed reforms.

    The assassination provided Austria-Hungary with an excuse to take action against Serbia. During July 1914 the situation escalated, pulling in the major European powers via the complex alliance relationships each had struck up with one another. The result was world war.

    http://www.firstworldwar.com/bio/ferdinand.htm

    The shots that killed the heir-apparent to the imperial throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his wife, Sophie, in Sarajevo on June 28th 1914 unleashed the destruction of the Habsburg empire, the most advanced multicultural and multi-ethnic state that Europe had ever seen. The imperial government in Vienna believed that the assassination was a Serb-backed plot; an ultimatum was followed by war; Russia came to Serbia’s defence, Germany to Austria’s, France to Russia’s and so on. A Balkan squabble about Bosnia-Herzegovina, a province grabbed by the Habsburgs from the declining Ottoman empire, caused the destruction of a whole world.

    http://www.economist.com/books/displaystory.cfm?st...

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    besides the reality that maximum cutting-side historians allocate some or a great style of the blame to Germany, further study have revealed that there became into in simple terms as plenty 'will to conflict' in different international locations. In 1991, the British historian Samuel Williamson, in his e book, Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the 1st worldwide conflict, argued that Austria-Hungary became into the two to blame for the conflict, marrying a German expansionism with an Austrian desire to escalate into the Balkans. different historians noted militaristic/bellicose attitudes in France and Britain. This led some historians after the Nineteen Seventies to return to Winston Churchill's advice that conflict got here in 1914 by using fact of a popular restlessness for the time of Europe, wherein each physique became into turning to violence as a manner of finding out their dissatisfactions (for occasion, the suffragettes, the commerce unions, and the two Catholics and Protestants in Northern eire, began to apply rigidity interior the years previously 1914). maximum these days, some historians have been drawing interest additionally to the sensation in Austria-Hungary and Russia that, by some skill, a conflict ought to be the answer for their very own inner problems. The ruling instructions of Russia and Austria-Hungary was hoping that a conflict would help them to come back administration of their people, and forge a sparkling unity. The historian Ruth Henig summarises cutting-side thinking on the conflict while she writes: What relatively marked out the decade previously 1914 became right into a failure of statesmanship and desire. via 1912, maximum ecu governments had come to believe that a popular ecu conflict became into inevitable and that the themes which plagued them at abode and in a foreign country ought to no longer be settled via negotiation and international family members… In those circumstances, conflict appeared to offer a perfect way out ... The stability sheet in 1918 proved how incorrect that they were. R. Henig, The Origins of the 1st worldwide conflict (1989)

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.