What steps is Obama prepared to take to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons?

If diplomacy fails and the international community doesn't feel like getting involved? I think this is an important question and would like to know his thoughts on this.

9 Answers

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Has anyone even TRIED diplomacy?

    US refused to make a deal with the previous president; Khatami, who was a decent man. Ahmedinejad is on his way out, and its a great time to start diplomatic relations.

    I don't understand why people believe moronic politicans over lets say all of the intelligence agencies in the world. You have the National Intelligence Estimate ( a group of 16 american intelligence agencies) telling you Iran is nowhere near a nuclear weapon and couldn't have 1 even if it wanted 1 for atleast three years.

    Why don't you ask what will Obama do about the 200 nuclear weapons that Israel has?

  • 1 decade ago

    Nothing, he'll sympathize with their position that they have the same rights as the USA to acquire nuclear weapons to defend themselves.

    Obama will nod in agreement and ask Congress "What's wrong with that?" Then Obama will make some good jokes and share some weed and alcohol or whatever they like, hug them, slap them on the back and bump knuckles.

    Obama will caution them to be careful then send them an invitation to a $ 2 million White House bash and give them an autographed photo of himself.

  • 4 years ago

    Are you psychic? How do you comprehend what the president of Iran is going to assert in a speech? How have you ever learnt that he's even going to grant a speech? Iran has under no circumstances threatened the US and in the event that they threaten Israel that's no longer america's challenge. so some distance as reducing spending on wrestle weapons and risk-free practices procedures, different than you haven't any longer seen the republicans are becoming to be the rustic into purely slightly economic challenge. i'm questioning what led to that disaster to return up. could it very probable be irresponsible spending on long drawn out uneccessary wars? The human beings mostly could desire to focal element purely slightly extra on their disaster at abode then on struggling with wars in 12 superb muslim international places. do no longer concern the rustic is and could constantly be some distance from "sitting ducks." i've got not got faith that any of the international places which will do no longer forget approximately attacking america definitely have the skill to wrestle a conflict with them. in case you do no longer forget approximately Al-Quida to be terrorists then why do you care what their deffinition of any word is? however the funniest element which you seem to fret approximately will on no account be arising any new nuclear weapons. i don't comprehend what we are able to have the skill to do devoid of anymore nukes. We purely have sufficient to explode the entire international. What might we ever do if we additionally could desire to explode some different planets too? thank you for the laughs :)

  • 1 decade ago

    The first he needs to prove where he was born. He migh not qualify to be a President after all

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Flux capacitor and a Yugo. (budget cuts)


  • 1 decade ago

    None... he's just going to let them do it. He'll probably send them some materials if they need any.

  • 1 decade ago

    he will just sit down with the leader (who hates us) wit no pre conditions . He has already said that he will do this now if he could.

  • 1 decade ago

    Obama has said it himself, he will "sit down and talk" with terrorist leaders. He thinks he can '"sit down and talk" with the likes Ahmadinjad? DOUBTFUL.

  • 1 decade ago

    He will give them Israel, and make them promise not to attack any state that voted for him.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.