If drugs for cancer was profitable?
the way erectile dysfunction is with the sale of Viagra, do you think capitalist drug companies would have found the cure for cancer by now?
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
The Pharmaceutical companies make billions from anti-cancer drugs that have little effect. If a cure was found it would not be released for human sheep. i.e. 95% of the world's population.
- buchyLv 43 years ago
From what I comprehend, the powers-that-be desire to cut back the style of people to 250 million. So why worry looking a treatment? additionally, fairly it sluggish in the past I discovered that there already exists a treatment for the massive C. Garlic: one clove an afternoon - mixed and added to water, or yogurt or something - might have a 60% threat of curing the massive C thoroughly. If one would not do the trick, then i've got self belief that 2 will. it is something that i'll attempt if i'm getting the possibility. merely think of of it, the worldwide greatest killer cured thoroughly via a house grown backyard herb. does not the pharmaceutical marketplace love that? merely think of how lots their income could be slashed via. No ask your self they do each and every thing they might to keep away from us people from re-discovering previous expertise. Society cares not something for people, society cares for funds... and in straight forward terms funds.
- Mathmajor PiLv 69 years ago
You don't understand anything about drug research do you? More money goes into cancer research than about anything else. The cancer drugs we have now are a modern miracle. But they are incredibly expensive to develop and produce.
Never mind that billions go into research that does not pan out. Do you even realize that the diagnosis of cancer was a death sentence only 25 years ago and now nearly half are cured. You would rather whine about drug companies than be thankful for this little fact.
I suppose you don't even have a clue about the uses of sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension. Of course not.Source(s): Doctorate in a medical field
- Anonymous4 years ago
Many of the causes of erectile dysfunction are actually psychological. Understand that this is not the same as saying that it’s all in your head, because it’s not. Learn here https://tr.im/0RyVt
Psychological issues can easily lead to a variety of very real physical ailments. If that surprises you, it shouldn’t. Stress can lead to heart disease, so why can’t other psychological issues lead to ED? It’s a pretty common, fairly well understood phenomenon.
Stress is, in fact, one of the leading causes of ED, which makes it a particularly nasty condition (because it also can lead to heart troubles, so it hits you twice). Long before stress kills you though, it will impact your sex life in a major, and entirely negative way.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous9 years ago
Drug companies dont want to cure anything. The only want to keep you on drugs and treat whatever condition you have
- JPLv 79 years ago
In a way, drugs for cancer are profitable. Even a slight success rate causes great usage. Because of this, cancer research is fairly well funded. Have you considered the gender issue? Or quality of life?
- TimLv 69 years ago
No I dont think so. Were not the only country looking for a cancer cure so you cant blame it on American companies. Europe, India, Japan, and China have great scientist and they cant find the cure either.
- Anonymous9 years ago
if someone found a cure to cancer don't you think that someone would have came out with it?
it would make all other drugs obsolete if only one other company did it an patented it would be over for allt he other medicines
- PowerLv 79 years ago
No they don't want to cure cancer they do make a fortune from drugs. Have you heard how many people use chemotherpy & radiation, etc.
- xpatinasiaLv 79 years ago
"Cancer drugs" are profitable and effective.