Aviation weather sources?

I'm trying to find a little bit of information to support what I was taught years ago. I was told that you have to get your weather and notams from an approved source, either FSS, DUAT, or DUATs. At the time I believed what I was told without questioning it, but the more I learn the more I am unsure about that.

91.103 requires pilots to become familiar with weather and notams, but doesn't say anything about how you must get them. The QCIP requirements from AC 00-62 doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the information provided, and as an AC it certainly isn't regulatory.

I'm not questioning the use of reputable services like FSS or DUATs, but if I want to get my weather information from fltplan.com, AWC, or even the weather channel, I personally don't see a problem with it, but I'm looking for a publication or personal experiences that will ahead some light on the issue.

Update:

Skipper, that doesn't even relate to my question. I'm aware other sources exist, I even listed AWC (aviation weather center, the link you gave me), the question is about whether or not there is a requirement to use certain "approved" sources.

Update 2:

fanman, that brings up an interesting point of being able to prove you received the information. This may be legal question, so for now it's all "your best guess" unless someone happens to know of a specific examples, but would internet browser history on a personal computer with controlled access (password to log in) also serve as evidence of a briefing?

My gut tells me yes, as long as I have a good lawyer.

Update 3:

Now I remember why I don't frequent this site any more. What was a question about regulation has turned into why I'm not a competent pilot because I may get my weather from the tv rather than through the phone. Last I checked pressure systems and fronts do what they do regardless of who sees them doing it, but the point is moot because it has nothing to do with the original question. If you want to discuss how my airmanship needs to be improved, feel free to email me, otherwise keep it to yourself.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Here you have a nice guide written by FAA on to how to plan a flight accordingly to weather, and how to use approved weather information systems and what they are.

    http://www.faa.gov/pilots/safety/media/ga_weather_...

  • FanMan
    Lv 5
    9 years ago

    There are many sources for accurate weather information, and different people prefer different sources. I use different sources for different things, whether just before flying or a longer term outlook, local or cross country, etc. The thing about DUAT is that it counts (and is on record) as an "official" briefing, just as if you called FSS on the phone, so if there's any issue caused by lack of the proper information, you can prove you had the briefing... I don't think that's true of other sources.

  • 9 years ago

    Like FanMan said, it's about "proving" you collected the information. I don't think search history would do it (you could have remained signed in, etc.) because there's no telling that was you (DUATs records your account tail number). Could question to send to John Yodice at AOPA maybe.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Airmaship:

    - You plan a flight

    - You get faxes or maps of current and predicted weather for your trip.

    The sources are not important, as long as you "trust" them! Faxes and maps for the latest TAFs and METARs.

    YOU decide to take off... or not.

    THAT is the role of a captain.

    If you fly like a lawyer, then, DON'T FLY.

    Fly like a Captain.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    "My gut tells me yes, as long as I have a good lawyer"

    >my< gut tells me you lack airmanship.

    your aviation weather sources should be those you won't be ashamed to deploy ad the ramp inspection from a fellow FAA guy.

    weather channel does not count as one of those.

    having weather channel as an "emergency data source" could be defendable.

    "being able to prove you received information" printed weather data from reputable sources make wonders.

    at least, a written down VOLMET information broadcast

    Source(s): where >I< fly, printed version of weather enroute and at destination present and predicted for the length of flight, has to be onboard together with the rest of documents for flight (the gross weight calculation etc)
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    The far/objective/POH references are what you desire siting with you as you're taking this attempt. besides the shown fact that, do no longer enable it somewhat is a huge overload! i'm fairly specific you at the instant are not paying the instructor for his time together as you're taking this attempt. It sounds like an exceedingly solid take-domicile attempt, and having an awareness of the approach and/or components mandatory for each question to be replied wisely is important. you may desire to no longer be desiring to be conscious of lots of the content cloth of the questions you have listed for the Solo go-us of a. however not one of the questions are relatively unimportant, their solutions shouldn't tie you up and make you sense stupid. of course you at the instant are not. An occasion: #fifty two Your understanding of the gasoline intake of the airplane ordinarily words is somewhat important. in case you're making some assumptions like the airplane oftentimes won't time-honored lots extra suitable than 75% potential on a go-us of a trip, and that the one hundred fifteen hp potential-plant will bypass it somewhat is common 6.4 gallons in keeping with hour, and which you will initiate with finished tanks (you do be conscious of the way lots the tanks carry whilst finished), then you may reason interior the process the question of what you will might desire to wisely and legally finished your flight. The specifics required to do the mathematics mandatory to good answer #fifty two are got here upon interior the POH. The reasoning to evaluate and reassess assorted situations because of fact the flight progresses might desire to be in place (and your instructor already recognizes that it somewhat is or would be) earlier the flight is signed off. you're mind-blowing suitable to the part of the attempt. you additionally are appropriate approximately multiple the different solutions you have gained. on the different hand, it would desire to be extra everlasting on your memory so which you will dig out the respond which you at the instant are not required to land at Airport B with a view to effectively finished the go-us of a in case you do no longer sense it somewhat is risk-free, than to have some unknown respondent from our on line international hand it to you. a solid awareness of the pertinent chapters of the FARs/objective will velocity the hunt technique, yet so could a solid seek engine. the certainty is none human beings can continuously quote financial disaster and verse for the solutions and could for this reason might desire to do in simple terms what you may desire to do: keep finding. solid luck, you would be effective.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.