Can you name one smart person who is a creationist?
Michael Behe believe in common descent, therefore he can't be called a creationist
Werner Arber (Nobel Laureate) believe that God probably intervened during evolution, but he is not a creationist
15 Answers
- РобертLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
Some modern scientists who have accepted the biblical account of creation
Dr. William Arion, Biochemistry, Chemistry
Dr. Paul Ackerman, Psychologist
Dr. E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics
Dr. Steve Austin, Geologist
Dr. S.E. Aw, Biochemist
Dr. Thomas Barnes, Physicist
Dr. Geoff Barnard, Immunologist
Dr. John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics
Dr. Jerry Bergman, Psychologist
Dr. Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
Dr. Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry
Dr. David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer
Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics
Dr. Rob Carter, Marine Biology
Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics
Dr. Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics
Dr. Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering
Dr. Donald Chittick, Physical Chemist
Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
Dr. John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist
Timothy C. Coppess, M.S., Environmental Scientist
Dr. Bob Compton, DVM
Dr. Ken Cumming, Biologist
Dr. Jack W. Cuozzo, Dentist
Dr. William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics
Dr. Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering
Dr. Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist
Dr. Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging
Dr. Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
Dr. Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
Dr. Bryan Dawson, Mathematics
Dr. Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education
Dr. David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
Dr. Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div
Dr. Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr. Ted Driggers, Operations research
Robert H. Eckel, Medical Research
Dr. André Eggen, Geneticist
Dr. Dudley Eirich, Molecular Biologist
Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics
Dr. Andrew J. Fabich, Microbiology
Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy
Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry
Dr. Kenneth W. Funk, Organic Chemistry
Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
Dr. Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science
Dr. Paul Giem, Medical Research
Dr. Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
Dr. Duane Gish, Biochemist
Dr. Werner Gitt, Information Scientist
Dr. Warwick Glover, General Surgeon
Dr. D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
Dr. Robin Greer, Chemist, History
Dr. Stephen Grocott, Chemist
Dr. Vicki Hagerman, DMV
Dr. Donald Hamann, Food Scientist
Dr. Barry Harker, Philosopher
Dr. Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics
Dr. Mark Harwood, Engineering (satellite specialist)
Dr. George Hawke, Environmental Scientist
Dr. Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist
Dr. Harold R. Henry, Engineer
Dr. Jonathan Henry, Astronomy
Dr. Joseph Henson, Entomologist
Dr. Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy
Dr. Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service
Dr. Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist
Dr. Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science
Dr. Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
- rindosLv 44 years ago
As William Badke positioned it, “Ridicule is the backside form of argument. It nicely-knownshows immaturity and a scarcity of ability to handle the themes in an smart way” (study concepts). that's a logical fallacy called "question-begging epithet." And as Casey Luskin suggested, “enable me share some concepts on a thank you to handle the internal maximum assaults, the tries to marginalize you with rhetoric. First, once you face such an attack, attempt to no longer take it for my section. on the different, be inspired considering that's often a demonstration which you're triumphing the argument. in the journey that your fighters had something logically compelling to assert, you will possibly be valuable they may well be announcing it. the actuality that they experience compelled to hotel to emotional rhetoric and private assaults ability that, on logical and evidential grounds, you have made a solid argument” (A friendly Letter to the Heartland Institute). If somebody has to hotel to call calling, sarcasm, insults, ridicule, etc. to place down yet another guy or woman’s place, then what does that say with regard to the potential of their very own place?
- Anonymous9 years ago
Jesus Christ
Source(s): The Bible - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 9 years ago
LadyMorgana's answer is a prime example of what I'm going to say: I think it will be impossible to convince you that any creationist is intelligent. By the world's standards, creationists are dumb, asinine fools who believe in wishful thinking. It seems that your only goal is to shoot down creationists, so there really is no use in telling you what you're expecting me to.
- vorenhutzLv 79 years ago
there are plenty of smart people who believe stupid things. Edgar Mitchell, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling... I'm sure you could find some creationists to put on that list. on the other hand, some creationists are dumb as rocks. it ain't necessarily so, is all I'm saying.
- Joaquim ZorroLv 79 years ago
I think you should get out of your capsule and roam around your nearest campus and conduct a survey; you'd be surprised and astonished that you disbelievers are counted on only one hand.
- LessyLv 49 years ago
How smart? I dont know any reeeally smart people but my neurologist (at a top medical center btw) believes in god. So does my dentist
- Lady MorganaLv 79 years ago
There is no such thing. Anyone who believes in creationism is, by definition, an idiot.
