Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Lv 5
Ghost asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 years ago

Were the Boston Bombings a false flag attack in order for the government to train for Martial Law?

I highly think it was. The two supposed "terrorists" were Russians hired by US to act in this setup but the bombs were denoted by the military and their cover up for acting on Martial Law was to hunt down the bombers by shutting down the entire city of Boston.

If you don't believe me, go watch documentaries on them. This is basically 9/11 II.

8 Answers

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    It would be consistent with Democrat policy in the past. The Boston bombing was exactly according to Operation Northwoods from the Kennedy years.

    Operation Northwoods was a plan proposed in March 1962 for the Kennedy administration to carry out fake terrorist attacks on cities in the USA, to be blamed on Cuba so that Kennedy would have an excuse to attack Cuba openly. But after the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion, Kennedy lost his nerve and turned down the idea. But he promoted the person who proposed it, and made him the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963, after the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962.

    Operation Northwoods was evolved from the Bay of Pigs invasion, which Eisenhower turned down when he saw it, but Kennedy gave it the green light in 1961 and it failed miserably.

    That angered Castro so that he invited the Soviets to start basing ICBM's in Cuba, which triggered the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

    To end the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy had to withdraw the U.S. missiles he had in Turkey, before the Soviets finally withdrew their missiles from Cuba.

    Then Kennedy portrayed himself as the hero, when actually he was the **** who caused the whole crisis in the first place.

    The FACT is that the planning and preparations for the 9/11/2001 attack started during the Democrat CLINTON presidency, including terrorist pilots taking flying lessons in the USA and being reported to the government by alarmed flying schools all over the country.

    But for "some" reason, the Clinton administration failed to act on any of these reports of alarmingly suspicious activities, and a terrorist attack occurred against a major city in the USA because of it.

    This is consistent with the DEMOCRAT Kennedy presidency discussing a disturbingly similar plan back in 1962.


    Source(s): The 9/11/2001 attack was a combination of elements from Operation Northwoods and the Bay of Pigs air attack. At Bay of Pigs, the planes were disguised as Cuban Air Force planes, to evade air defenses by making it difficult to identify them as hostile aircraft. In 9/11/2001, the planes were civilian jetliners, to evade air defenses by making it difficult to identify them as hostile aircraft. At Bay of Pigs, the pilots were foreign (Cuban exile) pilots, to conceal the fact that the attack was being carried out by the USA. In 9/11/2001, the pilots were foreign (Muslim terrorist) pilots, to conceal the fact that the attack was being carried out by the USA. If we believe that the Bay of Pigs air attack actually happened, then we can not deny that our government was capable of doing the exact same thing 40 years later against targets in the USA.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Anyone who's first response to any major event is "false flag attack" does in fact deserve to be beaten senseless - which should only take a fraction of a moment.

  • 8 years ago

    The best training is always from real world experience. But no, I don't believe the US had anything to do with that particular attack.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    I used to think that no American President would do something like that.

    Or that an American President would not force us to buy a product from a private company

    Or that an American President would spy on all Americans with no reason

    Or that his people would not call our returning troops terrorist suspects.

    Things have certainly changed

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 8 years ago

    Does it matter? What political difference if any would that knowledge make. It likely is true, and there is jack **** any one of us can do about it.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    Ummm... Tin Foil hat too tight?

  • 8 years ago

    Probably not, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if it was proven that it was.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Most certainly .

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.