The beginner's guide to opposition of uninhibited racial heterogeneity
Logic says one should never tolerate or advocate aspects that have or can only have exclusively detrimental impact. Uninhibited racial heterogeneity is a societal condition that has exclusively detrimental impact, as the evidence overwhelmingly powerfully shows. Therefore, advocating uninhibited racial heterogeneity is illogical (or indicative of enemy disposition).
People who understand this are more intelligent than those who do not.
Morality says one should never advocate aspects that threaten continuity of desirable human attributes (e.g. high general mental capability, high general physical capability, high general physical attractiveness (which is maintained primarily through preservation of people of specific European racial types or those who are a mixture of the types) and so on) and societal qualities (e.g. maximum protection against external threats, lack of malignant and/or degrading culture, lack of ghettoisation, lack of misery caused by avoidable death, lack of misery caused by avoidable destruction). Uninhibited racial heterogeneity is a societal condition that threatens continuity of desirable human and societal qualities. Therefore, advocating uninhibited racial heterogeneity is immoral.
People who know and accept this are more moral and/or tactically aware than those who do not.
This really should not be difficult to understand.
Highly incisive, very aware and very intensely strong-minded and pragmatic logician and tactician, very high-grade threat detector, nurturer of life-saving mental enhancement and developer of superior methods of societal organisation. Vehement advocate of human advancement, invulnerability and continuity / realisation of desirable and/or protective human, societal and global attributes (will viciously oppose any person or entity threatening these, without exception).