Why are House Socialist Democrats are trying to bully other Democrats to impeach a president without any real evident to make their claim?

Every since Donald Trump, was cleared had was proving innocent doing the Robert Mueller investigation. It seem like these big city Democrats are trying to bully other democrats to get Trump out of offices, with out any evident to back their claim a violation and plus most real democrats feel it is a waste of time trying to impeach a president with nothing their. I say next year vote all socialist out of power they are a danger to our democracy.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    You mean "evidence", not the related word, "evident".

    As to evidence, there is plenty.

    The emoluments clause in the Constitution: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_...

    That says officials of the government cannot benefit from doing business with foreign sources while in office. Any investments or companies they control must be sold or turned over to a blind trust. That has not been done by Rump.

    Rump violates that daily by having a major hotel where foreign dignitaries stay and pay for that to his corporation that he controls.

    Rump violates that when he directed the Dept of Defense to redirect air cargo shipments stops into a small airport in Ireland. The airport needs traffic, and sells fuel at commercial rates. This costs extra. And crews are bused 30 miles to a Rump golf resort for a stay at standard fees. The resort needs that airport to stay open. The usual path is to fly to a USAF base for fuel and rest stay at government fees.

    Rump was not cleared at all by the Mueller Report. Mueller said and wrote that his job was to investigate only as an arm of the Justice Dept. Not even the Attorney General, the head of it, can charge the President of anything, even shooting someone, while he is in office. Only Congress can do that. The first step is impeachment by the House (going on now). The second step is a trial in the Senate. The senators must convict by 2/3 majority to remove the President.

    The latest flap about the phone call to Ukraine is about enlisting a foreign government official to find dirt on a political candidate of the US election.

    Persuasion was to hold up military aid money until that is done. That is conspiracy to control a US presidential election. Then the transcript of the call was placed in a secret intelligence computer, accessed only by the highest officials by password. Usually done for military or spying secrets. That is an attempt to cover up the conspiracy by Rump. That is an even more serious offense by many, since they recognized the call was a crime.

    Before you make claims against the purposes of Democrats, you had better get facts, not listen to opinions.

  • 1 year ago

    Nothing in the Mueller investigation proved him innocent. The report actually said he may very well be guilty.

  • 1 year ago

    The White House supplied the evidence in the "transcript" of the phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president. Are Democrats supposed to ignore it?

    Also, the Mueller Report found clear evidence of obstruction of justice by Trump. Mueller even included a legal analysis to destroy the defenses raised by Trump's legal team.

    Read the "transcript" and try to understand what you're reading.

  • 1 year ago

    "with out any evident to back their claim"

    You mean evidence like a whistleblower coming forward and saying the president made an improper call with a foreign leader and the White House moved to cover it up?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Mimi
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    I suspect that the four horseman of the Progressive Party threatened to have the other freshmen Representatives primaried if they didn't comply.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.