Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 1 year ago

Now can we impeach Trump? How clearly did the 3 constitutional scholars explain why we MUST impeach?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 year ago
    Favorite Answer

    They were abundantly clear. 

    The 3 expert  scholars were crystal clear on why this is important and why he should be impeached. 

    Even the 4th expert did not totally disagree.......but repeated the republican  BS  about "rushing the process".....despite Trump's every effort to delay it. 

    They whined about not hearing from the most important witnesses......the ones Trump forbade from Testifying.  He instructed others to IGNORE subpeona's and then they cry that the LAW isn't being respected here. 

    All I heard out of cons  was  "Hommina Hommina Hommina"   while the 3 experts, were clear, concise, well spoken and accurately laid out their case, convincingly. 

    It is clear to a blind person,  articles of Impeachment are merited. 

  • James
    Lv 5
    1 year ago

    There are more scholarly minds about law living on the sidewalks of Los Angeles . 

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    God, Help the President in underserved overserved overall ways let’s understand our President in all the good things he does! In Jesus name Amen 

  • Foofa
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    Contact your Senators and ask them to vote for impeachment when this moves to the Senate.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    LOL!................................. Won't happen.

  • 1 year ago

    It was extraordinarily clear and concise, though Republicans deny the importance of their testimony, pleading it as here-say and irrelevant.

  • Clive
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    What does this have to do with elections?

  • 1 year ago

    liberal trump haters

  • y
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    You mean the three partisan hacks who brought in their own opinions as opposed to citing factual laws. One even went with the colluding with Russia line which has never been proved. That reinforces that it is a political hack job as opposed to law.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    3 extremely liberal, politically biased lawyers that ignored the inconvenient facts.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.