Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 months ago

Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.): "A jury would convict Trump in three minutes flat." True or False?

22 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    A real jury, yes. The GOP bootlickers in the senate, no.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    No, they would give serious consideration and take 4 minutes to convict him.

  • 8 months ago

    In his mind, true. He and his ilk has already make up their minds, the facts be damned. It's ironic he brought up the "jury" analogy. Even in a "slam dunk" case, a REAL jury is out, deliberating the evidence for an hour or so, because they care about justice being done and not pushing though some biased political agenda.

  • RockIt
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    A jury he hand picked, yes. A jury selected in a court of law, no.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Murzy
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    True. There is enough evidence to convict him if it were tried in a regular court.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    That is completely stupid and Nadler just showed he is a LIAR. 

    Indeed, even someone like you should know that they are talking about days and days of testimony with tens of thousands of pages of documents.  

    If Nadler is suggesting that the rest of the US is as psychotic as Nadler and too immoral to even look through and consider the evidence, I think Nadler is wrong. 

  • 8 months ago

    False. No evidence of a crime has been presented, and every witness so far has admitted to having no firsthand knowledge of Trump breaking the law.

    On top of that, the Democrats haven't been at all consistent in what crime they're alleging Trump committed. First it was extortion, then bribery, then obstruction, then witness intimidation, then they claimed they could impeach him over his alleged motives without him having committed a crime, then treason, then back to the push to impeach him for nothing more specific than he's a bad guy...

    They have nothing on him. Nothing.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    I have not heard any evidence of wrongdoing by Trump, so I would vote to acquit.

  • 8 months ago

    They might but they would not be doing their duty. What evidence do they have?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5AjKNnXGik

    Youtube thumbnail

    &feature=youtu.be

  • 8 months ago

    Desperation. That's all it is.

  • 8 months ago

    An all Democrat jury operating in a Leftist , bubble , echo chamber .

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.