Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Social ScienceEconomics · 1 month ago

If a government offers $3000 to each family for giving birth to a child (to increase population), is it a direct incentive or positive?

Update:

Would it be a direct incentive or positive incentive? 

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Oiy
    Lv 5
    1 month ago

    It's a direct incentive because it's a direct transfer payment in economics. Based on the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), it will increase GDP more than 4-5 folds. But economic theory is not enough to evaluate the policy if people will give more births. It's an inverse of a one-child policy in China that war tough without any transfer payment.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Robert
    Lv 6
    1 month ago

    I do not see it as positive. The US Government gives tens of thousands of tax payer dollars to people who are ill equipped to parent a child they can't afford. The welfare system encourages a lack of responsibility. Children are a responsibility and not a right.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 month ago

    I thought government was taking livelihood away from people to prevent birth. But there seems to be some push to incentify low income workers to keep up the supply of low income workers.

    Not direct incentive but, direct enough.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    ...................no.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 month ago

    Anyone who took such a deal would be an idiot, as a child will cost a parent, or parents, far more than that just in the first year.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.