Gungy
Lv 6
Gungy asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 month ago

Now the senate has it - Schiff/Nadler/Pelosi all repeatedly said they had overwhelming evidence, then why spending 10+ hours saying...?

...they absolutely need more witnesses and documents?

Is that a TRANSLATION: "we lied and don't have basically nothing so we need to get the senate to do the job we failed to do in the House".

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 month ago

    And Trump has repeatedly said, and is still saying, that he 'welcomes' having Bolton, Pompeo, Perry, Mulvaney testify. So why is the White House still blocking them?

    Why has the White House produced ZERO of the thousands of subpoenaed documents?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    The Democrats already presented a case they claimed was solid enough to sign and present articles of impeachment . It's supposed to be time to judge the case

    • ...Show all comments
    • Ominous Cowherd
      Lv 6
      1 month agoReport

      If the witnesses are necessary to the claim of overwhelming evidence, and they haven't been heard from, then they don't have overwhelming evidence. This simple logic escapes tribeca, because it has rocks in its skull.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Jim2
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    They did have overwhelming evidence, to a reasonable person. But these people are not reasonable. The heavier the hammer the easier it is to drive in a railroad spike. In this case, you need a 75 lb. Sledgehammer ( which they don't make, but you need one.)

    • ...Show all comments
    • Ominous Cowherd
      Lv 6
      1 month agoReport

      Executive privilege doesn't go away just because members of the house want to impeach. That's an asinine idea, which you would understand if you thought about it for more than two seconds. But you can't do that.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    “Don’t have anything, basically”. “Don’t have nothing” is a double negative, which actually would mean they have something and putting “basically” where you did in the sentence made it worse, basically.

    👎 to writing skills.

    USA 🇺🇸! USA 🇺🇸! USA 🇺🇸! 

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 month ago

    Trump has blocked relevant witnesses and documents.  The American people deserve a fair trial and a historical record that reflect the facts of this very serious case. 

    Whether the Senate acquits or convicts, there should be a proper trial record on which to base the votes.  That is common sense.  

    • ...Show all comments
    • y
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      The truth is, what Trump blocked the house should have taken to court, they did not, why?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    They're basically saying they decided to impeach Trump on nothing but hearsay with no evidence, and now they want the Senate to do their jobs for them.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    You do understand what a trial is, right? It is where you call witnesses and introduce evidence. I can't believe how hard of a concept this seems to be for so many Republicans.

    • ...Show all comments
    • Ro
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Pascal..... impeachment trial isn't like the TV show Law and Order, sweetie.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    "There isn’t any evidence, they don’t have any...because there aren’t any impeachable offenses. They had their own opportunity to find the evidence, to produce the evidence. They don’t have any. They didn’t produce any because there isn’t any." -Rush Limbaugh

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Ro
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    You nailed it. Democrats and their shiit-show aren't fooling anyone.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Yavan
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    They would like the evidence PRESENTED to the Senators. And they would like the witnesses that Trump all blocked from testifying to TESTIFY, because they were NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY FOR THE HOUSE.

    • ...Show all comments
    • BB
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Why wouldn't the Dems allow the Bidens or Schiff or the Whistleblower testify??

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.