Did Trump's lawyers make the point that there should be testimony from first hand witnesses?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Nancy
    Lv 7
    8 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Indirectly, yes. But that doesn't matter. Making points doesn't matter. Everyone's mind is already made up. Make points. Don't make points. It makes no difference. Every Senator in that room has already knows how they're going to vote and have known since before the trial started.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    The whistleblower should call their bluff and say he/she will testify, they would be handing out toilet paper to the GOP Senators

  • 8 months ago

    Any other testimony is hearsay and is generally not admitted in a trial. The real first hand testimony that Schiff and Nadler did not allow would have been from the whistleblower. None of this would have happened without him and it is important to know just how credible he is. Why wouldn't Schiff allow him to be questioned?

  • 8 months ago

    No, pretty much they said the opposite. .

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Sally
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    I hope so, but I don't think that was their intention.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    No they did not

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    democrats never called on the whistleblower as a witness when they had the chance

  • 8 months ago

    They are trying their damnedest to prevent that .

    They know witnesses will only say stuff that proves Trump guilty. 

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.