Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentOther - Politics & Government · 1 month ago

Democrats, why exactly do you now want to remove Washington and Lincoln statues?

These two men fought for freedom. Washington freed us from British rule, and Lincoln freed the slaves. It's messed up that Democrats now are targeting these two historical figures. 

17 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 day ago

    BLM rioters resent US Europid Founding Fathers & Europid Society of having taught Congoids skills that weren't needed in the bush, taught them a written language, adapt, participate, & benefit from academics, science, mathematics, engineering, aeronautics, electrification, literature, sports, cinema, economy, law & Abolished Slavery that Congoid Africans had no intention of Abolishing which in a way makes Europid society benevolently superior. Rather than free themselves from Europid DNA & systemic racism used as a deflection of (D) failures, Congoids hungered for what the Founding Fathers laid out for future generation & Europid DNA. If it wasn't for the US Constitution, Abolition of Slavery & Civil Rights would've never come with USA not existing divided up by UK, France, Spain, & Russia or Germany, Japan, Italy, Iran, & Turkey. Frederick Douglas lauded the US Constitution as "the greatest document ever created". 

     

    Civil Rights Attorney/Activist Leroy Terrell stated "BLM is a shake down period", & that Congoid run (D) cities are deflecting their weakness & incompetence on "systemic racism that doesn't exist in 2020". BLM/ANTIFA's quest for dismantling Law Enforcement is for BLM/ANTIFA & organize crime to be given permission to commit unrestricted crimes against Europids, Middle Eastern (Jews, Arabs, Persians Turks), East Asians & South Asians. The crime data reflects how Congoids are 7-15x higher in interracial crime than any group & 7-15x less likely to be victims of interracial crime. Hundreds of racist attacks on Jews in crown heights Brooklyn by Congoids are ignored by partisan news media because the racists are Congoids. Lone Europids in Congoid cities are being surrounded by racist Congoids attacked with lumber, bricks, bicycles, & inside school busses calling their assaults as 'Polar Bear Hunting'.

     

    BLM will use any incidents, fabricated or not, against Europids to keep the victim mentality alive to advance their socialist agenda & for Congoid crimes & bigotry to be tolerated for them to intimidate & oppress non-Congoids. Non-Congoids can empathize, but to demand them to be subservient to Congoids victimhood delusion is bullying. BLM don't care about Secoriea Turner David Dorn & other victims of BLM to loot & burn communities to scream & intimidate that Caucasian, European, Persian, Turkic, Oriental, Siberian, S/E, Asian, S. Asian, Central Asian, Amerindian... do not matter as much. Congoid lives mattered more than others since the Civil War, Civil Rights, Affirmative Action, & extreme pandering, except in Africa & (D) Congoid cities. Congoids are heavily patronized. BLMs CHAZ/CHOP (D)s was a crime ridden zone legal businesses & residence are threatened with looting & vandalism, coming to Minneapolis & Atlanta. BLM chants Pigs in a Blanket' Fry em' like bacon, what do we want dead cops, & tags BLM graffiti on vandalize & looted buildings, how's that peaceful? US law enforcement takes a lot of abuse, harassment, & assassination for being very soft & lenient to law breakers (only in America) attracting criminals across the world. US being the most lenient country in crime & punishment in the world contributes to large amount of re-offenses & incarceration rate. 

     

    Trying to paint Bigotry, Discrimination, Hate & Tribalism (only self reliance, honor, humble, honest, wisdom & kindness can suppress) as inherently European is false as such behavior is human animal nature along with slavery started with Early humans in East Africa when early humans expanded into separate tribes competing for territories & limited food resources. Journalist Keith Richburg Author of Out of Africa 'Thanked God for Slavery' bringing his ancestors to the USA. 

     

    The practice of slavery was universally accepted world wide for 10,000+ years. African's, Amerindians, Middle Easterners... committed massacre's to acquire slaves. Abolitionist Shakers, Anabaptist, & (R)s viewed it as something that shouldn't be practiced any longer, while the (D)s viewed it as an accepted practice sanctioned & allowed by god since Biblical Abraham. Both side felt they were in the right, but (R) abolitionist ideals won. Socialist & BLM Supremacist are labeling all descendant of European descent (including arrivals after 1865-2020 half descendent from emancipated serfs) as eternally racist because the Founding Fathers bought slaves from Africans that Europids later emancipated. 

     

    Serfdom, Caste, & Chattel were 3 types of slavery practiced. Serfdom was when the family or clan & their descendants within the land owned by a lord or lords are enslaved by whom ever owns the land or who it falls to. Chattel Slavery is what revisionist claim was exclusive in the Americas only. Chattel Slavery have been practiced in Ancient Rome, the Middle East & Africa before Columbus. In the 7th Century Islam turned the male Congoid Chattel Slaves into eunuchs. Just like in pre-Civil War USA, Slave owners in ancient Rome can free their slaves. In Islam the slave has to convert to Islam, but great exemplary sacrifice to the nation's society was required (militaristic conquest/defense). Trans-Atlantic & East Arabian Slave trade, Arabs, Arabize Congoids, & hunt/gather Congoid Kingdoms or Villages did the dirty work of massacring 1/2-2/3rds of the villages they raid or conquer to obtain the slave. Caste slavery is probably the worst form of slavery where a clan or entire tribe & their descendants are restricted to only one profession for the rest of their lives. 

     

    Congoids seceding for Independence would be the only solution to the problem of European descent having a higher chance of being victims of interracial crimes 45%. Most of the recent African Immigrants (Somali (Ilhan Omar), Nigerian, Ghanaian...) are no different from most descendants of slaves their ancestors captured & sold to the East Arabian & Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade in taking advantage of the grievance hustle & scams that Booker T. Washington warned of. “There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Ne9r0 race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Ne9r0 to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” Booker T. Washington. 

     

    Who could Booker T. Washington be talking about? BLM, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, Kaepernick, DNC... Congoid (D)s are impassionate against the memory of slavery, but affiliates with the party of slavery (D). (D)s donning kente cloth stoles is like draping the Confederate battle flag on their bodies. The kente cloth was created (likely in1800s) by Ashanti kingdom known for raiding villages & rival Kingdoms for slaves to supply the Trans Atlantic & East Arabian Slave Trade showed how ignorant (D) congress are of the Ashanti's role with slavery. The Ashanti, among other tribes, argued against abolition of slavery as it was their god given right to own & trade slaves as dictated by their oracle. The ancient swastika symbol wasn't a symbol of Europid supremacy, but because the NAZI wore the Swastika, believed in Europids supremacy & carried out genocide on Caucasian Jews, it was labeled a symbol of hate. 

     

    Congoid Supremacist & Socialist adopted the phrase BLM because it's less threatening than Blk Power!, but still behaves to intimidates to force conformity. If they really want full freedom from Europid Systemic Racism then separation for independence is what they should strive for, not eternal begging & extortion. They can make their own currency, take responsibility & hold themselves accountable to become self reliant, write their own laws, discipline the delinquent, criminal & corrupt element among them by policing themselves, & create jobs or put 40+ millions Congoids to work. No Longer will they chant no justice no peace & blame their incompetence & corruption on Europid people, killing the race grievance industry using racism as an excuse or hide behind to mask their own tribal bigotry, bias, crime & corruption. It'll end affirmative action with high emphasis on merit & discipline. 

     

    When children become of age they are expected to leave & be on their own. It's been 156 years since emancipation. Many exceptional Congoid descent were taught & educated by Europid instructors/professors before integration of schools were mandated such as Katherine Goble Johnson. Merit was a big deal then, but not anymore as public schooling has deteriorated with lackluster teachers, curriculums & 1/3 of students are unwilling to learn than follow a disciplined & honorable lifestyle. After the 60s, athletes, singers, actors, & entrepreneurs have made thousands of Congoid millionaires & some billionaires. Together they can all Finance & invest in an independent sovereign territory the size of Puerto Rico or Puerto Rico itself, enough for 10-15+ million people with skyscrapers 60+ million population is possible, copying the Singapore model (once a tiny backwater nation 1/12 the size of Puerto Rico with a population of 5.7 million gaining independence in 1965 without US aide & loans becoming a modern metropolis in just 30 years).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi6r3hZe5Tg

    Youtube thumbnail

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200...

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200...

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200...

    Source(s): The US Civil War was a war fought between European descents, one trying to preserve the Union & end slavery, the other trying to preserve slavery practiced across the world by all ethnic groups for 10,000+ years. Since the Civil war was financed by Europids (millions spent), 640,000 Europid lives sacrificed, Emancipation of slaves was Given & Not won, & 22 trillion spent to fight poverty to educate & help Congoid communities improve & be self reliant failed, then a territorial area the size of Puerto Rico is more than enough as there were only about 4 million Congoid descent in the end of the Civil War. Liberia was the promised land for freed Congoid US Slaves that's 15x bigger than Puerto Rico & negotiating for 1/3 of Liberia will provide more green space.
  • 1 month ago

    I Haven't heard of this one yet but I am a democrat & I certainly do not want "ANY "statues" torn down or even changing names of various things & places. History CANNOT be changed. Get it your head people. Getting rid of statues will not change anything. History is done. We should learn from it not try to change it. Sure many things in the past were not desirable to everyone but that's what makes democracy great.  Everyone has an opinion even if we all do not all agree with it. To me as a veteran & 85yr. old man I am ashamed with what the citizens have become. I didn't go to Korea during the war to protect ridiculous situations such as going on today. This is not the America I went to war for. I'm really ashamed as I said & it brings tears to my eyes when I see all the beautiful things destroyed. Including the lives of young people who will never live in our beautiful country with YES beautiful people too. What a waste of time & effort that could be put to better & more constructive use.                        I realize everyone is different but isn't it great that we are? It sure makes life more interesting & challenging for me at least. I've been to 12 countries & everywhere I went people just loved that I was from the US. Now if I travel anywhere I will never admit to anyone where I was from. I'm just too ashamed & that's a shame This is simply my opinion with tears in my eyes. 

  • 1 month ago

    When you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party comes to mind?

    The Republicans? Or, the Democrats?

    Most people would probably say the Democrats.

    But this answer is incorrect.

    Since its founding in 1829, the Democratic Party has fought against every major civil

    rights initiative, and has a long history of discrimination.

    The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynching's, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.

    In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party.

    Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the

    aim of abolishing it entirely.

    This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court.

    In the 1857 case Dred Scott v. Sanford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens;

    they’re property.

    The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery?

    All Democrats.

    The two justices who dissented?

    Both Republicans.

    The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war.

    The commander-in-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln – the man who freed the slaves.

    Six days after the Confederate army surrendered, John Wilkes Booth, a Democrat,

    assassinated President Lincoln.

    Lincoln’s vice president, a Democrat named Andrew Johnson, assumed the presidency.

    But Johnson adamantly opposed Lincoln’s plan to integrate the newly freed slaves

    into the South’s economic and social order.

    Johnson and the Democratic Party were unified in their opposition to the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery; the 14th Amendment, which gave blacks citizenship; and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the vote.

    All three passed only because of universal Republican support.

    During the era of Reconstruction, federal troops stationed in the south helped secure

    rights for the newly freed slaves.

    and 22 black Republicans served in the US Congress by 1900.

    The Democrats did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

    But after Reconstruction ended, when the federal troops went home, Democrats roared back into power in the South.

    They quickly reestablished white supremacy across the Hundreds of black men were elected to southern state legislatures as Republicans,

    region with measures like black codes – laws that restricted the ability of blacks to own property and run businesses.

    And they imposed poll taxes and literacy tests, used to subvert the black citizen’s

    right to vote.

    And how was all of this enforced?

    By terror -- much of it instigated by the Ku Klux Klan, founded by a Democrat, Nathan Bedford Forrest. As historian Eric Foner - himself a Democrat - notes:

    “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.

    President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, shared many views with the Klan.

    He re-segregated many federal agencies, and even screened the first movie ever played at the White House - the racist film “The Birth of a Nation,” originally entitled

    “The Klansman.

    A few decades later, the only serious congressional opposition to the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 came from Democrats.

    Eighty percent of Republicans in Congress supported the bill.

    Less than 70 percent of Democrats did.

    Democratic senators filibustered the bill for 75 days, until Republicans mustered the

    few extra votes needed to break the logjam.

    And when all of their efforts to enslave blacks, keep them enslaved, and then keep them from voting had failed, the Democrats came up with a new strategy: If black people are going to vote, they might as well vote for Democrats.

    As President Lyndon Johnson was purported to have said about the Civil Rights Act,

    “I’ll have them n*****s voting Democrat for two hundred years.

    So now, the Democratic Party prospers on the votes of the very people it has spent much of its history oppressing.

    Democrats falsely claim that the Republican Party is the villain, when in reality it’s

    the failed policies of the Democratic Party that have kept blacks down.

    Massive government welfare has decimated the black family.

    Opposition to school choice has kept them trapped in failing schools.

    Politically correct policing has left black neighborhoods defenseless against violent crime.

    So, when you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party should come to mind?

  • Foofa
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    The rank and file registered voters of both major parties are being dragged along by the nose by the more extreme elements claiming their banner. Most Democrats don't care about statues but see this as a temporary blip (in the same way a lot of Republicans are just hunkering down and waiting it out through the Trump years). 

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • kswck2
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    Nope. Nope. Nope. Both were racist, both has slaves-Lincoln just didn't admit to it. 

  • 1 month ago

    It seems that they had some minor character flaws when looking backward through a 200 year old lens.  However, democrats are showing more hate and racism in abundance TODAY than anyone did in the past.

  • 1 month ago

    Liberals would kill their own Grandmother's if it would help get Trump out of office. They have spent the last 50 years destroying the Traditional Values that built this country. It's truly perverted. 

  • 1 month ago

    Which leading democrats said they should be removed?  I haven't and no one I know personally has.  Neither have I heard an elected official call for that.

  • John
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    That is a distortion from conservatives.

  • 1 month ago

    I'd say about 0.5% of democrats want to remove Washington statues.  It's a tiny fraction of the liberal wing of the party.

    And even fewer, maybe zero want to remove Lincoln's Statue.  In fact I've never heard of anyone having a problem with the Lincoln Statues.   Maybe you can tell us who wants to tear them down, it sounds like it might be a right wing lie.Anyway, aside from your straw man (washington and lincoln), let's talk about what this is really about, RACIST CONFEDERATE TRAITOR STATUES OF MEN WHO OWNED MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND ATTACKED US SOLDIERS ON US SOIL.Those statues can burn for all I care.  Seriously fvck those guys.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.