Why did the communist judges reject over 60 cases we had about the fraudulent elections?

I saw on One America News that China paid the judges off.

42 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 month ago
    Favorite Answer

    The judges, many of them being conservatives, overwhelmingly rejected these cases due to the simple fact that there was no valid evidence of fraud. It doesn't take much intelligence to fact check Trump's claims (factcheck.org and politifact are good nonpartisan sources) and to actually read the court transcripts where Trump lawyers suddenly changed their tune and claimed there was no fraud when they would be legally liable if caught lying in court.

    This is not the first time little boy Trump has cried fraud. In the 2016 election he claimed he lost the popular vote due to fraud and established a committee to investigate. That committee found around 10 total cases of fraud and the majority were ironically fraudulent Trump votes.

  • 1 month ago

    You do understand that a great deal of those adjudicators were Republican or potentially were somehow or another upheld or named by Trump.

  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    WARNING: IDIOT ALERT

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    Neither side Democrat nor Republican were very convincing and the status-quo won. As we are finding out the more outrageous the lie the number of people believing them is staggering. All it takes is common sense looking at a ballot to see something is askew.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 month ago

    What fraudulent elections, and in which country? In the USA, that was asserted without evidence, and just as quickly dismissed without evidence.

  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    I believe many of the judges are Trump appointees.

  • garry
    Lv 6
    1 month ago

    may be because laws are different in china and the government is different too , shame you americans think you only have to obey your laws when in a different country ...

  • 1 month ago

    No evidence?  So all of the signed affidavits, the videos of questionable behavior at the polling sites, the questions about the validity/accuracy of the voting machines - none of that is evidence?  How about all of the evidence that was never found regarding the Russia collusion circus?  That didn't stop the Dems from continuing to pursue it.  So how is that different?

  • 1 month ago

    Because there was no fraud

  • Aspen
    Lv 4
    1 month ago

    You do realize that a lot of those judges were Republican and/or were in some way supported or nominated by Trump. 

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.